Sears v. County of Butte, et al.,

Filing 16

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 7/29/2016 GRANTING 15 Request to Extend Page Limit re Motion for Summary Judgment; ALLOWING the defendants up to twenty-seven (27) pages for their Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support of Motion for Summary Judgment; ALLOWING any opposition to said motion to be up to twenty-seven (27) pages in length; ORDERING that any reply not exceed fifteen (15) pages. (Michel, G.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Stephen E. Horan, SBN 125241
William E. Camy, SBN 291397
350 University Avenue, Suite 200
Sacramento, California 95825
TEL: [phone] • FAX: [phone]
Bruce S. Alpert, SBN 75684
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL
COUNTY OF BUTTE
25 County Center Drive, Suite 201
Oroville, CA 95965
TEL: [phone] • FAX: [phone]

Attorneys for Defendants, COUNTY OF BUTTE, BUTTE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE,
ANDY DUCH and JOHN KUHN

11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PORTER | SCOTT

350 University Ave., Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95825
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

12
13
14

MICHAEL SEARS,

15
16
17
18
19

Plaintiff,
v.
COUNTY OF BUTTE, BUTTE COUNTY
SHERIFF’S OFFICE; ANDY DUCH; JOHN
KUHN; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
Defendants.

20

CASE NO.: 2:15-cv-00589-MCE-CMK
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
REQUEST TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT
FOR ITS MEMORANDUM OF POINTS
AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Complaint Filed: 3/16/15

21
22
23
24

___________________________________/

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

1
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT FOR ITS MEMORANDUM
OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

{01581807.DOCX}

1

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. Defendants be allowed to up to twenty-seven (27) pages for their Memorandum of

3

Points and Authorities in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Partial

4

Summary Judgment.

5

2. Any opposition to said motion may also be up to twenty-seven (27) pages in length; and

6

3. Any reply shall not exceed fifteen (15) pages.

7
8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 29, 2016

10
11

PORTER | SCOTT

350 University Ave., Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95825
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT FOR ITS MEMORANDUM
OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

{01581807.DOCX}