Myles v. Montgomery
Filing
17
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/14/2015 ORDERING petitioner to show cause, within 30 days, why his failure to oppose respondent's motion to dismiss should not be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion, and he shall file an opposition.(Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ORLINDO ANTONIO MYLES,
12
13
14
No. 2:15-cv-00591 GEB-GGH
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
WARDEN W.L. MONTGOMERY,
15
Respondent.
16
17
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
18
2254. On August 18, 2015, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. Petitioner has not filed an
19
opposition to the motion. In accordance with the court’s April 23, 2015, order petitioner had until
20
September 17, 2015, to file an opposition or notice of non-opposition. See ECF No. 3. Petitioner
21
has yet to file an opposition or notice of non-opposition to respondent’s motion. Local Rule
22
230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a
23
statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the
24
motion . . . .”
25
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner shall show cause,
26
within thirty (30) days, why his failure to oppose respondent’s August 18, 2015, motion to
27
dismiss should not be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion, and he
28
shall file an opposition. Petitioner is cautioned that failure to respond to the instant order, or to
1
1
file an opposition to the pending motion to dismiss, will result in a recommendation that this
2
action be dismissed.
3
Dated: October 14, 2015
4
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
5
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
/myle591.osc.mab
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?