Martin v. Town of Paradise et al

Filing 26

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/11/2016 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court's orders pursuant to F.R.Cv.P. Rule 41(b), E.D. Cal. R 110; REFERRING this matter to Judge John A. Mendez; ORDERING that any objections be filed within twenty-one (21) days. (Michel, G.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RICHARD S. MARTIN,

12

No. 2:15-cv-0594 JAM AC (PS)

Plaintiff,

13

v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

14

TOWN OF PARADISE, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
On February 19, 2016, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause why this action should not

17
18

be dismissed for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 25. Plaintiff has not responded to the court’s

19

order, nor taken any action to prosecute this case.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, without

20
21

prejudice, for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the court’s orders. See Fed. R.

22

Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. R. 110.
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

23
24

assigned to this case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one (21)

25

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

26

objections with the court. Such document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

27

Findings and Recommendations.” Local Rule 304(d). Plaintiff is advised that failure to file

28

////
1

1

objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order.

2

Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

3

DATED: April 11, 2016

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2