Jackson v. California Board of Parole Hearings

Filing 30

USCA JUDGMENT as to 24 Request/Motion for Certificate of Appealibility DENYING said Request for Certificate of Appealability; DENYING any pending motions as moot. (cc: Ninth Circuit) (Michel, G.)

FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHNNY CLIFFORD JACKSON,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.

No.

NOV 07 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

16-15559

D.C. No.
2:15-cv-00609-KJM-KJN
Eastern District of California,
Sacramento

CALIFORNIA BOARD OF PAROLE
HEARINGS,
ORDER
Respondent-Appellee.

Before:

CANBY and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

The request for a certificate of appealability is denied because appellant has
not shown that “jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states
a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would
find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.”
Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2);
Gonzalez v. Thaler, 132 S. Ct. 641, 648 (2012).
In order for a district court to consider a second or successive 28 U.S.C.
§ 2254 petition, this court must first authorize the district court to consider that
petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3). The Clerk shall serve this order and a copy

of the standard form application for leave to file a second or successive petition on
appellant.
Any pending motions are denied as moot.
DENIED.

2

16-15559