Plastic Pollution Coalition, a project of Earth Island Institute v. Amcor Rigid Plastics USA, Inc.

Filing 17

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 05/24/16 ORDERING that the proposed 13 Consent Decree is ADOPTED by this Court and by this Order shall be entered. In accordance with the Consent Decree, all claims in the complaint a re conditionally DISMISSED under FRCP 41(a)(2), with the Court retaining jurisdiction to enforce the Consent Decree. As the Consent Decree fully resolves this case, the Clerk of the Court is ordered to terminate this case. CASE CLOSED CASE CLOSED (Benson, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 GARY DAVIS (SBN 098792) Davis & Whitlock, P.C. 21 Battery Park Avenue, Suite 206 Asheville, NC 28801 Telephone: (828) 622.0044 Fax: (828) 398.0435 Email: gadavis@enviroattorney.com JAMES M. BIRKELUND (SBN 206328) Law Offices of James Birkelund 548 Market St., # 11200 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 602.6223 Fax: (415) 789.4556 Email: james@birkelundlaw.com RACHEL S. DOUGHTY (SBN 255904) Greenfire Law 1202 Oregon St. Berkeley, CA 94702 Telephone: (828) 424.2005 Email: rdoughty@greenfirelaw.com Attorneys for Plastic Pollution Coalition, a project of Plaintiff Earth Island Institute 16 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 20 21 PLASTIC POLLUTION COALITION, a project of EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE, a non-profit organization, 22 Case No. 2:15-CV-00614-WBS-KJN PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Plaintiff, 23 vs. 24 AMCOR RIGID PLASTICS USA, INC., and AMCOR RIGID PLASTICS USA, LLC, 25 26 Complaint Served: April 16, 2015 Judge: Hon. William B. Shubb (Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251, et seq.) Defendants. 27 28 29 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 30 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 31 1 1 WHEREAS, on March 24, 2016, the Parties lodged with this Court a proposed Consent 2 Decree, signed by each (Dkt. 13-1) and simultaneously submitted the same to the U.S. 3 Department of Justice pursuant to the requirements of the Clean Water Act, 33, U.S.C. § 4 1365(c)(3); 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 WHEREAS, on May 4, 2016, the U.S. Department of Justice filed with this Court a letter stating that “the United States has no objection the proposed consent decree;” (Dkt. 15) WHEREAS, the [Proposed] Consent Decree lodged with this Court lacked a signature line for entry by this Court, which is the desired outcome of this case of each of the Parties; THEREFORE: Counsel hereby stipulate to entry of the proposed Consent Decree by this Court on behalf of their respective clients, each of which signed and agreed to be bound by the terms of the [Proposed] Consent Decree prior to it being filed with this Court and reviewed by the U.S. Department of Justice. Dated: May 23, 2016 GREENFIRE LAW 14 15 By: 16 17 18 19 20 Dated: May 23 , 2016 CASTELLÓN & FUNDERBURK, LLP By: 21 22 23 24 25 __/s/ Rachel S. Doughty________________ Rachel S. Doughty James M. Birkelund Gary Davis Attorneys for Plaintiff PLASTIC POLLUTION COALITION /s/ Ruben A.Castellon Ruben A. Castellon Anna L. Le May Attorneys for Defendants AMCOR RIGID PLASTICS USA, INC. and AMCOR RIGID PLASTICS USA, LLC All other signatories listed, and on whose behalf this filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing. 26 27 28 /s/ Rachel S. Doughty Rachel S. Doughty 29 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 30 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 31 2 1 ORDER OF ENTRY OF CONSENT DECREE 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: 3 The proposed Consent Decree lodged as docket entry 13-1, is adopted by this Court and 4 5 by this Order shall be entered. In accordance with the Consent Decree, all claims in the complaint are conditionally 6 dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), with the Court retaining jurisdiction to 7 enforce the Consent Decree. As the Consent Decree fully resolves this case, the Clerk of the 8 Court is ordered to terminate this case. 9 10 APPROVED AND SO ORDERED. Dated: May 24, 2016 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 30 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 31 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?