Jarrard v. City of Redding et al

Filing 31

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 5/3/17 ORDERING that Defendants' pending MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment 25 is hereby STAYED, pending the consummation of settlement discussions. The hearing on Defendants' pending MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment is RESET for 6/29/2017 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3

GARY BRICKWOOD, SBN 94892
BRICKWOOD LAW OFFICE
1135 Pine Street, Suite 210
Redding, CA 96001
[phone]
FAX: [phone]

4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF REDDING
and KENNETH MARKS
JOHN L. BURRIS ESQ., SBN 69888
BEN NISENBAUM ESQ., SBN 222173
JAMES COOK ESQ., SBN 300212
THE LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
Airport Corporate Centre
7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120
Oakland, California 94621
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

11
Attorneys for Plaintiff
12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15
JOEL JARRARD, an individual,

Case No. 2:15-cv-00615 TLN CMK

16
Plaintiff,
17
vs.
18
19
20

CITY OF REDDING, a municipal corporation;
KENNETH MARKS, individually and in his
capacity as an officer for the Redding Police
Department; DOES 1-25, inclusive,
individually, jointly and severally,

STIPULATION AND ORDER STAYING
DEADLINES RE: DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY
JUDGMENT

21
22

Defendants.
________________________________/

23
24
25
26

STIPULATION AND ORDER STAYING DEADLINES RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

1

1
2
3
4
5

STIPULATION
WHEREAS, Defendants have filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, with
Plaintiff’s responsive pleading pending, and a hearing date of May 18, 2017 at 2:00 p.m.
WHEREAS, the parties are currently involved in settlement negotiations that, if
consummated, would resolve the entire action.
WHEREFORE, the parties stipulate to continue the deadlines for Plaintiff’s responsive

6
7
8
9
10
11

pleadings to Defendants’ pending dispositive motion, to May 22, 2017, with Defendants’ Reply
briefing due May 30, 2017.
Based on the parties calendars, including a 9th Circuit oral argument by Plaintiff’s counsel
in Lam v. City of San Jose set for June 15, 2017, the parties respectfully request the Court continue
the hearing date on Defendants’ pending motion, if needed, to June 22, 2017, at 2:00 p.m.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

12

Respectfully submitted,

13
14

Dated: May 2, 2017.

BRICKWOOD LAW OFFICE

15
/s/ GARY BRICKWOOD
GARY BRICKWOOD
Attorney for Defendant

16
17
18
Dated: May 1, 2017.

LAW OFFICES OF JOHN BURRIS

19
20
21

By:

/s/ JAMES COOK
JAMES COOK
Attorney for Plaintiff

22
23
24
25
26

STIPULATION AND ORDER STAYING DEADLINES RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

2

1
2
3

ORDER
PURSUANT to the parties’ stipulation, Defendants’ pending motion for partial summary

4

judgment is hereby stayed, pending the consummation of settlement discussions. Should the

5

instant action not be settled, contingent on City Council approval and execution of the settlement,

6

by May 22, 2017, Plaintiff’s shall file their opposing documents to Defendants’ pending Motion
for Partial Summary Judgment by that day, May 22, 2017. Defendant Reply briefing, if any, shall

7
8
9

be filed no later than May 30, 3017.
The hearing on Defendants’ pending Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is re-set from
May 18, 2017 to June 29, 2017 at 2:00 p.m.

10
11
12

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: May 03, 2017

13
14

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

STIPULATION AND ORDER STAYING DEADLINES RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

3