Jarrard v. City of Redding et al
Filing
33
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 5/17/2017 ORDERING that Defendants' pending 25 motion for partial summary judgment is hereby further STAYED, pending the consummation of settlement discussions. Should the inst ant action not be settled, contingent on City Council approval and execution of the settlement, by 5/30/2017, Plaintiff's shall file their opposing documents to Defendants' pending Motion for Partial Summary Judgment by, 5/30/2017. Defendants' Reply briefing, if any, shall be filed no later than 6/6/2017. The hearing date on Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment shall remain unchanged: 6/29/2017 at 2:00 p.m. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
GARY BRICKWOOD, SBN 94892
BRICKWOOD LAW OFFICE
1135 Pine Street, Suite 210
Redding, CA 96001
(530) 245-1877
FAX: (530) 245-1879
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF REDDING
and KENNETH MARKS
JOHN L. BURRIS ESQ., SBN 69888
BEN NISENBAUM ESQ., SBN 222173
JAMES COOK ESQ., SBN 300212
THE LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
Airport Corporate Centre
7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120
Oakland, California 94621
Telephone: (510) 839-5200
Facsimile: (510) 839-3882
james.cook@johnburrislaw.com
11
Attorneys for Plaintiff
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
JOEL JARRARD, an individual,
Case No. 2:15-cv-00615 TLN KJN
16
Plaintiff,
17
vs.
18
19
20
CITY OF REDDING, a municipal corporation;
KENNETH MARKS, individually and in his
capacity as an officer for the Redding Police
Department; DOES 1-25, inclusive,
individually, jointly and severally,
STIPULATION AND ORDER FURTHER
STAYING DEADLINES RE:
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
21
22
Defendants.
________________________________/
23
24
25
26
STIPULATION AND ORDER FURTHER STAYING DEADLINES RE: DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
1
1
STIPULATION
2
WHEREAS, the Court previously granted the parties’ stipulation to stay deadlines
3
regarding Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (see Doc. No. 31, continuing
4
Plaintiff’s deadline to respond to Defendants’ Motion to May 22, 2017) and re-set the hearing date
5
on Defendants Motion for Partial Summary Judgment from May 18, 2017 to June 29, 2017 at 2:00
p.m.
6
7
WHEREAS, the parties are continuing settlement negotiations that, if consummated, would
resolve the entire action, and need further time to complete settlement negotiations.
WHEREFORE, the parties stipulate to further continue the deadlines for Plaintiff’s
8
9
10
responsive pleadings to Defendants’ pending dispositive motion, to May 30, 2017, with
Defendants’ Reply briefing due June 6, 2017.
The requested continuance would not impact the re-set hearing date of June 29, 2017, at
11
2:00 p.m., which would remain on calendar.
12
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
13
Respectfully submitted,
14
15
Dated:
, 2017.
BRICKWOOD LAW OFFICE
16
17
/s/ GARY BRICKWOOD
GARY BRICKWOOD
Attorney for Defendant
18
19
20
Dated: May 16, 2017.
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN BURRIS
21
22
23
By:
/s/ Benjamin Nisenbaum
Ben Nisenbaum
Attorney for Plaintiff
24
25
26
STIPULATION AND ORDER FURTHER STAYING DEADLINES RE: DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
2
1
ORDER
2
PURSUANT to the parties’ stipulation, Defendants’ pending motion for partial summary
3
judgment is hereby further stayed, pending the consummation of settlement discussions. Should
4
the instant action not be settled, contingent on City Council approval and execution of the
5
settlement, by May 30, 2017, Plaintiff’s shall file their opposing documents to Defendants’
pending Motion for Partial Summary Judgment by that day, May 30, 2017. Defendants’ Reply
6
7
8
briefing, if any, shall be filed no later than June 6, 2017.
The hearing date on Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment shall remain
unchanged: June 29, 2017 at 2:00 p.m.
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 17, 2017
12
13
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
STIPULATION AND ORDER FURTHER STAYING DEADLINES RE: DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?