Evans v. Southern California Intergovernmental Training and Development Center
Filing
65
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 2/4/2020 EXTENDING Time to 7/15/2020, for the parties to file dispositive motions. All other dates set forth in the operative scheduling order remain in effect. (York, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Stephen R. Jaffe SBN 48539
The Jaffe Law Firm
101 California Street, Suite 2710
San Francisco, CA 94111
stephen.r.jaffe@jaffetriallaw.com
415.618.0100
Attorneys for Relator TAMARA EVANS
McDOUGAL, LOVE, BOEHMER,
FOLEY, LYON, CANLAS
8100 La Mesa Boulevard, Suite 200
La Mesa, CA 91942
(619) 440-4444
Attorneys for Defendant SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA INTERGOVERNMENTAL
TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel.
TAMARA EVANS,
Case No.: 2:15-cv-00619-MCE
14
Relator,
15
16
17
18
STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING
NEW DATE BY WHICH DISPOSITIVE
MOTIONS MUST BE FILED.
vs.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRAINING AND
DEVELOPMENT CENTER, et al.
19
Defendant.
20
21
The parties stipulate to the following facts:
22
1.
The present scheduling order (Document 47) requires the parties to file dispositive
23
motions no later than 180 days from close of discovery on September 20, 2019, or by
24
March 18 , 2020.
25
2. Stephen R. Jaffe, counsel for the relator in this action, is lead counsel for the relators
26
in United States of America ex rel Rose et al. v Stephens Institute et al, N. Dist. CA
27
Case No. 09-CIV-5966-PJH ( hereafter “US v AAU”).
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER
2
1
3. US v. AAU is in its eleventh year of litigation. It has been contentiously litigated in
2
the District Court, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and was the subject of an
3
unsuccessful petition for writ of certiorari by the defendant in the United States
4
Supreme Court.
5
6
7
8
9
10
4. US v AAU is set for jury trial on May 5, 2020. However, pretrial documents and
materials are due to be filed with the District Court commencing March 5, 2020.
5. Under the present scheduling order, it is impossible for Mr. Jaffe to prepare for trial
in US v AAU and, at the same time, prepare dispositive motions and/or oppose
defendant’s dispositive motion, if any, in this case.
11
6. No party will be prejudiced by the rescheduling order sought by this stipulation.
12
7. The parties agree this court may make an Order resetting the last date to file
13
dispositive motions in this action from March 18, 2020 to July 15, 2020.
14
15
16
17
18
McDOUGAL, LOVE, BOEHMER,
FOLEY, LYON, CANLAS
THE JAFFE LAW FIRM
By:_______/s/_____________
John Petze
Attorneys for Southern California
Intergovernmental Training
and Development Center
By:_____________/s/_____________________
Stephen R. Jaffe
Attorneys for Realtor EVANS
19
ORDER
20
The foregoing stipulation having been presented to the Court and good cause appearing,
21
the last day for the parties to file dispositive motions herein is continued from March 18, 2020 to
22
July 15, 2020. All other dates set forth in the operative scheduling order remain in effect.
23
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 4, 2020
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?