Evans v. Southern California Intergovernmental Training and Development Center

Filing 80

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 7/14/2020 GRANTING administrative request to exceed the Court's page limitation 77 . RTC may file a memorandum of points and authorities in support of its motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, partial summary judgment not to exceed forty (40) pages. Any opposition also shall not exceed forty (40) pages and any reply shall not exceed twenty (20) pages. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Steven E. Boehmer, Esq. (#144817) John E. Petze, Esq. (#118573) McDOUGAL LOVE BOEHMER FOLEY LYON & CANLAS 8100 La Mesa Blvd., Suite 200 La Mesa, California 91942 Telephone: (619) 440-4444 Facsimile: (619) 440-4907 EXEMPT FROM FILING FEES PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 6103 Attorneys for Defendant, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ex rel. TAMARA EVANS, Plaintiff/Relator, 12 v. 13 14 15 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER, and DOES 1-10, 16 Defendant(s). Case No.: 2:15-cv-00619-MCE-CKD ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO INCREASE PAGE LIMITATION FOR DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT Judge: Complaint Filed: Trial Date: Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr. March 19, 2015 None 17 18 Presently before the Court is the ex parte administrative request of defendant, 19 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT 20 CENTER (“RTC”), to exceed the Court’s page limitation of twenty (20) pages for RTC’s 21 memorandum of points and authorities in support of its motion for summary judgment or, in the 22 alternative, partial summary judgment, and to be allowed up to sixty-five (65) pages for its 23 memorandum of points and authorities. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 1 2:15-cv-00619-MCE-CKD ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO INCREASE PAGE LIMITATION FOR DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 1 Good cause appearing therefor, the Court grants the ex parte administrative request to 2 exceed the Court’s page limitation. RTC may file a memorandum of points and authorities in 3 support of its motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, partial summary judgment not 4 to exceed forty (40) pages. Any opposition also shall not exceed forty (40) pages and any reply 5 shall not exceed twenty (20) pages. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 14, 2020 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 2:15-cv-00619-MCE-CKD ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO INCREASE PAGE LIMITATION FOR DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?