Moak v. Sacramento County
Filing
22
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/3/16 ORDERING the Findings and Recommendations filed February 2, 2016 (ECF No. 21 ) are ADOPTED IN FULL; Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 12 ) is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's &q uot;Fourth" Amendment claim, but DENIED in all other respects. Defendant is directed to file a responsive pleading as to Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment claim within fourteen days from the date this order is electronically filed. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANDREW MOAK,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:15-cv-0640 MCE KJN P
v.
ORDER
SACRAMENTO COUNTY,
15
Defendant.
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief
17
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On February 2, 2016, the magistrate judge filed Findings and Recommendations herein
20
21
(ECF No. 21) which were served on all parties and which contained notice that any objections to
22
the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed
23
objections to the Findings and Recommendations.
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the Findings and Recommendations to be
24
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
27
///
28
///
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1. The Findings and Recommendations filed February 2, 2016 (ECF No. 21) are
ADOPTED IN FULL.
2. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 12) is GRANTED as to Plaintiff’s “Fourth”
Amendment claim, but DENIED in all other respects.
3. Defendant is directed to file a responsive pleading as to Plaintiff’s Fourteenth
Amendment claim within fourteen days from the date this order is electronically filed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 3, 2016
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?