Olson v. Hornbrook Community Services District, et al.

Filing 138

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 9/17/2020 STRIKING 104 116 124 126 Motions and DENYING 99 Motion for Extension as Moot. (Coll, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KIMBERLY R. OLSON,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. 2:15-CV-0646-KJM-DMC

v.

ORDER

HORNBROOK COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the

18
19

Court are a number of motions filed by plaintiff which are procedurally defective.
On February 28, 2020, plaintiff filed a motion to strike affirmative defenses

20
21

pleaded in the answer of defendant Julie Bowles. See ECF No. 116. On February 6, 2020, and

22

July 15, 2020, plaintiff filed motions for default judgments. See ECF Nos. 104, 124, and 126.

23

These motions, which all seek substantive relief, are defective because they were not noticed for a

24

hearing. See E. Dist. Cal. Local Rule 230(b). For this reason, the motions at ECF Nos. 104, 116,

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1

124, and 126 are stricken. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time, ECF No. 99, to file her

2

motion to strike affirmative defenses pleaded by defendant Julie Bowles is denied as moot. The

3

Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate these matters as pending motions.

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6

Dated: September 17, 2020
____________________________________
DENNIS M. COTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2