Marks v. Frauenheim

Filing 40

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/24/18 ADOPTING the findings and recommendations filed July 31, 2018, in full; DENYING Petitioner's motion for a certificate of appealability (ECF No. 36 ); and DECLINING to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL MARKS, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-0665 JAM DB P v. ORDER SCOTT FRAUENHEIM, 15 Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of habeas 17 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 31, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 20 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 38.) Petitioner 23 has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 39.) In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 24 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 ///// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 31, 2018, are adopted in full; 3 2. Petitioner’s motion for a certificate of appealability (ECF No. 36) is construed as a 4 Rule 59(e) motion and is denied; and 5 6 3. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253. 7 8 9 10 October 24, 2018                John A. Mendez_________________                United States District Court Judge  11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?