Stallsmith v. Linder Psychiatric Group, Inc. et al
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 5/28/2015 ORDERING that this case is REASSIGNED to the Honorable Carolyn K. Delaney. The parties shall take note that all documents hereafter filed with the Clerk of the Court shall bear case number 2:15-cv-00667-CKD. All currently scheduled dates presently set before Judge England are hereby VACATED. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
JOELLE STALLSMITH, on behalf of
herself and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
13
ORDER
v.
14
15
No. 2:15-cv-00667-MCE-CKD
LINDER PSYCHIATRIC GROUP, INC.,
a California corporation, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
18
Each of the parties in the above-captioned case has filed a “Consent to Proceed
19
Before a United States Magistrate Judge.” See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). According to E.D.
20
Cal. R. 305, both the district court judge assigned to the case and the magistrate judge
21
must approve the reference to the magistrate judge.
The undersigned has reviewed the file herein and recommends that the above-
22
23
captioned case be assigned and referred to the magistrate judge for all further
24
proceedings and entry of final judgment.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court reassign this case to the
2
Honorable Carolyn K. Delaney. The parties shall take note that all documents hereafter
3
filed with the Clerk of the Court shall bear case number 2:15-cv-00667-CKD. All
4
currently scheduled dates presently set before Judge England are hereby VACATED.
5
Dated: May 28, 2015
6
7
8
9
10
11
Having also reviewed the file, I accept reference of this case for all further
12
proceedings and entry of final judgment.
13
14
15
16
17
Dated: May 28, 2015
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?