Ireland v. Linder Psychiatric Group, Inc. et al
Filing
15
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/18/15 ORDERING that the schedule is as follows: Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 4/15/2016 with any supplemental disclosures due 04/09/16; Discovery due by 6/17/2016; Dispositive Mot ions filed by 07/26/16 and heard by 08/23/16; Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/7/2016 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez and Jury Trial set for 11/28/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. (Benson, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
11
12
Attorneys for Defendants
Linder Psychiatric Group, Inc.,
David Linder, M.D., and Renae Linder
Erick C. Turner, State Bar No. 236186
erick@callaborcounsel.com
Turner Law Group
1104 Corporate Way
Sacramento, CA 95831
Telephone: (916) 529-3265
15
Brian S. Crone, State Bar No. 191731
briancrone@cronelawoffice.com
The Law Office of Brian Crone
1104 Corporate Way
Sacramento, CA 95831
Telephone: (916) 395-4464
16
Attorney for Plaintiff JAMIE IRELAND
13
14
law corporation
weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin
10
Alden J. Parker, State Bar No. 196808
aparker@weintraub.com
Melissa M. Whitehead, State Bar No. 262123
mwhitehead@weintraub.com
weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin
LAW CORPORATION
400 Capitol Mall, 11th Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: (916) 558-6000
Facsimile: (916) 446-1611
17
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
JAMIE IRELAND, an individual,
Plaintiff,
v.
LINDER PSYCHIATRIC GROUP, INC., a
California Corporation; DAVID LINDER,
M.D., an individual; RENAE LINDER, an
individual; and DOES 1 to 15,
Defendants.
27
28
{1975128.DOC;}
1
Case No. 2:15-cv-00670-JAM-EFB
STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING
PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
Action Filed: December 31, 2014
First Amended Complaint: January 20,
2015
Action Removed: March 25, 2015
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
MODIFYING PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
1
Plaintiff JAMIE IRELAND (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants LINDER PSYCHIATRIC GROUP,
2
INC., DAVID LINDER, M.D., and RENAE LINDER (collectively, “Defendants”), by and
3
through their counsel of record, hereby submit the following stipulation and [proposed]
4
Order to modify the Pre-Trial Scheduling Order (Dckt. # 13) to continue the trial, and all
5
related deadlines and currently scheduled dates, as follows:
6
7
8
9
WHEREAS the Parties have agreed to and scheduled mediation, to take place on
December 11, 2015;
WHEREAS the Parties have engaged in written discovery and have essential
depositions that have not yet been scheduled;
WHEREAS the expert witness disclosures deadline is December 4, 2015;
11
WHEREAS the Parties agree that the time and expense associated with completing
12
depositions and preparing expert witness disclosures will impede the ability to mediate
13
and resolve this case;
14
15
law corporation
weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin
10
16
17
18
19
20
21
WHEREAS the Parties intend to conduct further discovery if mediation is not
successful;
WHEREAS the Parties and their counsel agree that an Order modifying the PreTrial Scheduling Order will not prejudice the Parties and can be issued forthwith;
WHEREAS the Parties and their counsel agree that this Stipulation is made in good
faith and not for any improper purpose;
WHEREAS there have been no previous modifications of the Pre-Trial Scheduling
Order in this matter;
22
WHEREAS good cause exists to modify the scheduling order, to allow the Parties to
23
meaningfully engage in further settlement discussions, private mediation, and to conduct
24
further discovery if the Parties do not reach a settlement.
25
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties, that:
26
1.
All dates in the Scheduling Order will be continued, subject to Court
27
approval, to allow the Parties to meaningfully engage in further settlement discussions,
28
private mediation, and to conduct further discovery if the Parties do not reach a
{1975128.DOC;}
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
MODIFYING PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
1
settlement. The Parties propose ///
2
the following new scheduling deadlines and dates, which are mutually agreeable to the
3
Parties, or dates thereafter:
Expert Witness Disclosures:
April 15, 2016
5
Supplemental Expert Witness Disclosures:
April 29, 2016
6
Discovery Cut-Off:
June 17, 2016
7
Dispositive Motion Filing Deadline:
July 26, 2016
8
Dispositive Motion Hearing Deadline:
August 23, 2016 at 1:30 p.m.
9
Final Pretrial Conference:
October 7, 2016 at 11:00 a.m.
10
Jury Trial:
November 28, 2016 at 9:00 a.m.
11
2.
The Parties agree to accept these proposed dates, or such later dates as the
12
Court may reasonably set in its discretion, subject to any subsequent adjustment
13
necessary for good cause shown.
14
15
law corporation
weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin
4
16
17
3.
Based on the foregoing, the Parties respectfully request this Court enter an
Order consistent with this Stipulation.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: November 17, 2015
18
Erick C. Turner, Attorney At Law
By:
19
Erick C. Turner
Attorney for Plaintiff
JOELLE STALLSMITH
20
21
22
/s/ Erick C. Turner
Dated: November 17, 2015
weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin
LAW CORPORATION
23
By:
24
/s/ Alder J. Parker
Alden J. Parker
Attorneys for Defendant
LINDER PSYCHIATRIC GROUP, INC.
25
26
27
28
{1975128.DOC;}
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
MODIFYING PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
1
ORDER (AS AMENDED BY THE COURT)
2
3
4
5
Based upon the Stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS SO
ORDERED.
Dated: 11/18/2015
6
/s/ John A. Mendez________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
7
8
9
11
12
13
14
15
law corporation
weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin
10
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
{1975128.DOC;}
4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
MODIFYING PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?