Peterson v. Hubbard

Filing 20

ORDER granting 19 Motion for Extension of time, signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/9/16. Petitioner shall file a supplemental opposition within 30 days from the date of this order. Respondent's reply is due 14 days thereafter. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RONALD KEMONI PETERSON,

12

Petitioner,

13
14

No. 2:15-cv-0689 KJM KJN P

v.

ORDER

SUZAN L. HUBBARD,

15

Respondent.

16
Petitioner requested a 30 to 45 day extension of time to file a supplemental opposition to

17
18

the motion to dismiss.1 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

19

1. Petitioner’s request for an extension of time (ECF No. 19) is granted; and

20

2. Petitioner shall file a supplemental opposition within thirty days from the date of this

21

order. Respondent’s reply is due fourteen days thereafter.

22

Dated: December 9, 2016

23
pete0689.111(2)

24
25
26
27
28

1

Petitioner also provided a copy of his April 18, 2014 letter to the Clerk of the District Court for
the Northern District of California in support of his argument that he was “bounced around like a
ping pong ball from San Francisco to Sacramento courts during these proceedings,” which
allegedly made it difficult for him to pursue habeas relief. (ECF No. 19 at 1.) Petitioner is
cautioned to include such argument and evidence in his supplemental opposition to ensure its
consideration therein.
1