Shawcroft v. Roundpoint Mortgage Servicing Corporation et al

Filing 31

MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/17/16 ORDERING a further Settlement Conference SCHEDULED for 10/19/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. Counsel shall, no later than 10/18/16 at 10:00 a.m., inform the courtroom clerk, Jonathan Anderson, whether the parties have complied with the above, and whether they still desire to hold the 10/19 conference. (Washington, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BARBARA SHAWCROFT, 12 No. 2:15-cv-00698 MCE KJN (GGH) Plaintiff MEMORANDUM and ORDER 13 vs. 14 ROUNDPOINT MORTGAGE ETC, 15 Defendant 16 17 18 On September 15, 2016, and as part of the settlement process, the undersigned and 19 counsel (Chad Carlock, Kristina Pelletier) spoke in a telephonic conference regarding compliance 20 with document production to which the parties had previously agreed, but had not satisfied. One 21 final agreement was made at this telephonic conference. 22 By September 22, 2016 defendant Round Point was to serve on counsel for plaintiff a 23 definitive list of documents requested by Roundpoint. Plaintiff was to produce such 24 documentation or explain why such was not available on or before September 30, 2016. 25 A further settlement conference was scheduled for October 19, 2016 (10:00 a.m). 26 Counsel shall, no later than October 18, Tuesday 10:00 a.m., inform the courtroom clerk for the 27 //// 28 1 1 undersigned (Jonathan Anderson) whether the parties have complied with the above, and whether 2 they still desire to hold the October 19th conference. 3 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED Dated: October 17, 2016 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?