Truschke v. Zufall, et al
Filing
61
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 10/2/2017 DISMISSING this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. CASE CLOSED.(Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JAMES EDWARD TRUSCHKE, JR.,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:15-cv-0701 DB P
v.
ORDER
JOHN ZUFALL, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42
17
18
U.S.C. § 1983. The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge. (ECF Nos. 4,
19
59.)
20
A recent court order was served on plaintiff’s address of record and returned by the postal
21
service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which requires that
22
a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. More than sixty-
23
three days have passed since the court order was returned by the postal service and plaintiff has
24
failed to notify the court of a current address.
25
////
26
////
27
////
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice
2
for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b). All pending motions are vacated.
3
Dated: October 2, 2017
4
5
6
7
8
9
/DLB7;
DB/Inbox/Routine/trus0701.33a
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?