Truschke v. Zufall, et al

Filing 61

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 10/2/2017 DISMISSING this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. CASE CLOSED.(Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES EDWARD TRUSCHKE, JR., 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:15-cv-0701 DB P v. ORDER JOHN ZUFALL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 17 18 U.S.C. § 1983. The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge. (ECF Nos. 4, 19 59.) 20 A recent court order was served on plaintiff’s address of record and returned by the postal 21 service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which requires that 22 a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. More than sixty- 23 three days have passed since the court order was returned by the postal service and plaintiff has 24 failed to notify the court of a current address. 25 //// 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice 2 for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b). All pending motions are vacated. 3 Dated: October 2, 2017 4 5 6 7 8 9 /DLB7; DB/Inbox/Routine/trus0701.33a 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?