Claiborne v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.

Filing 16

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/17/15 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed 5/18/15, are adopted in full; and Defendants CDCR, Major, Wamble, and Young are dismissed from this action with prejudice. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DENNIS G. CLAIBORNE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 v. No. 2:15-cv-0710 JAM CKD P ORDER CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 19 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 20 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 18, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 22 were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings 23 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the 24 findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 26 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 18, 2015, are adopted in full; and 3 2. Defendants CDCR, Major, Wamble, and Young are dismissed from this action with 4 prejudice. 5 DATED: June 17, 2015 6 /s/ John A. Mendez_________________________ 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?