Claiborne v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.

Filing 32

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 2/18/16 ORDERING that, upon reconsideration, the order of the Magistrate Judge filed 12/22/15, is AFFIRMED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DENNIS G. CLAIBORNE,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

v.

No. 2:15-cv-0710 JAM CKD P

ORDER

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION, et al.,

16

Defendants.

17
18
19

On January 8, 2016, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s

20

order filed December 22, 2015, revoking plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status and requiring him to

21

pay the filing fee for this action. (ECF No. 29.) Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate

22

judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the

23

entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly

24

erroneous or contrary to law.

25

////

26

////

27

////

28
1

1
2

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the
magistrate judge filed December 22, 2015, is affirmed.

3
4
5
6

DATED: 2/18/2016
/s/ John A. Mendez________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2