Givens v. County of Sacramento, et al.

Filing 65

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/31/2017 ORDERING 63 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel is DENIED without prejudice as premature. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FRANCOIS P. GIVENS, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:15-cv-0720-KJN PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 17 On May 25, 2017, plaintiff filed a motion to compel defendants to provide supplemental 18 responses to various requests for production of documents. (ECF No. 63.) For the same reasons 19 outlined in the court’s May 26, 2017 order (see ECF No. 64), and pursuant to Local Rule 251 and 20 the court’s scheduling order, plaintiff’s motion to compel (ECF No. 63) is DENIED WITHOUT 21 PREJUDICE as premature. 22 All parties are cautioned that they are required to initiate and exhaust informal meet-and- 23 confer efforts before requesting an informal telephonic discovery conference or filing a motion to 24 compel. Motions that fail to comply with that requirement will be summarily denied. 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 31, 2017 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?