Givens v. County of Sacramento, et al.
Filing
67
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/14/17 ORDERING that Plaintiff's MOTION for an Extension to respond to defendants' first set of written discovery requests 66 is GRANTED; Responses are due by 9/5/2017. Plaintiff's Request to Compel Discovery from defendants is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
FRANCOIS P. GIVENS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:15-cv-720-KJN PS
v.
ORDER
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
On July 13, 2017, plaintiff filed a motion for an extension of time to respond to
17
18
defendants’ first set of discovery requests, including requests for admission. (ECF No. 66.)
19
Plaintiff received the discovery requests on July 5, 2017, but claims that he has been unable to
20
access some of his legal materials due to a prison lockdown. He requests a 30-day extension to
21
respond to the discovery requests. In light of the circumstances as represented by plaintiff, and
22
given that the discovery completion deadline is many months away, the court grants the requested
23
extension pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 36(a)(3).
24
In his motion, plaintiff also renews his request for the court to compel certain discovery
25
from defendants. However, nothing in plaintiff’s motion suggests that meet-and-confer efforts
26
with respect to that discovery have been properly initiated and exhausted, as previously ordered
27
by the court. Therefore, the court denies that request without prejudice.
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension to respond to defendants’ first set of written
3
discovery requests (ECF No. 66) is GRANTED. Responses are due September 5,
4
2017.
5
6
2. Plaintiff’s request to compel discovery from defendants is DENIED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE.
7
8
Dated: July 14, 2017
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?