Murphy, et al. v. JP Morgan Chase, et al.

Filing 23

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 6/18/15 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed with prejudice. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days. (Manzer, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

TONYA MURPHY and SAMUEL
SMITH,
Plaintiffs,

13
14
15

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
v.
JP MORGAN CHASE, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

No. 2:15-cv-0725 KJM GGH PS

By order filed May 11, 2015, plaintiffs’ amended complaint was dismissed and twenty-

18

eight days leave to file a second amended complaint was granted. In that order, the court

19

informed plaintiffs of the deficiencies in their amended complaint. The twenty-eight day period

20

has now expired, and plaintiffs have not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to

21

the court’s order.

22

Plaintiffs have apparently decided to rest on the dismissed amended complaint. For the

23

reasons given in the May 11, 2015 order, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be

24

dismissed with prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

25

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

26

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

27

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

28

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings
1

1

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

3

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

4

Dated: June 18, 2015

5

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

6

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11

GGH:076/Murphy0725.fta

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2