Hicks v. State Medical et al
Filing
17
ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 4/2/2018 ORDERING the Clerk to randomly assign this action to a district judge and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
STEVEN HICKS,
12
13
14
No. 2:15-cv-0747 DB P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
STATE MEDICAL, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights
18
action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 21, 2018, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint,
19
dismissed it with leave to amend, and directed plaintiff to file an amended complaint within thirty
20
days. (ECF No. 15.) Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, updated his address, notified
21
the court that he is dismissing this action, or otherwise responded to the court’s orders.
22
By order dated March 6, 2018, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, within fourteen days,
23
why this action should not be dismissed. (ECF No. 16.) The fourteen day period has now
24
expired, and plaintiff has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court’s order.
25
Accordingly, the court will direct the clerk of the court to assign a district judge and recommend
26
that this action be dismissed for failure to comply with a court order.
27
28
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall randomly assign this action
to a district judge.
1
1
2
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See
Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
3
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
4
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
5
after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
6
with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings
7
and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified
8
time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153
9
(9th Cir. 1991).
10
Dated: April 2, 2018
11
12
13
14
DLB:12
DLB:1/Orders/Prisoner-Civil Rights/hick0747.fsc.dism
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?