Espinoza v. City of Tracy et al

Filing 65

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 03/09/18 ORDERING that Defendants' continued deposition of plaintiff Juan Espinoza, set for 03/09/18, shall last for 2.5 hours. At the deposition, Juan Espinoza shall answer defendants' ; questions regarding text messages and photos that were allegedly sent using a City-issued iPhone, with the understanding that such testimony is subject to the 58 stipulated protective order. The court reserves decision of any issues of admissibility that may arise concerning the deposition testimony. (Benson, A.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JUAN ESPINOZA

12
13
14

No. 2:15-cv-0751-WBS-KJN

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

CITY OF TRACY, et al.,

15
16

Defendants.

17
18

On March 8, 2018, pursuant to the parties’ request, the court conducted an informal

19

telephonic discovery conference in this matter. Attorney Russell Robinson appeared on behalf of

20

plaintiff, and attorneys Arlin Kachalia and Jesse Maddox appeared on behalf of defendants. After

21

considering the parties’ joint letter brief (ECF No. 63), as well as the arguments of counsel at the

22

conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

23
24
25

1. Defendants’ continued deposition of plaintiff Juan Espinoza, set for March 9, 2018,
shall last for 2.5 hours.
2. At the deposition, Juan Espinoza shall answer defendants’ questions regarding text

26

messages and photos that were allegedly sent using a City-issued iPhone, with the

27

understanding that such testimony is subject to the stipulated protective order (ECF

28

No. 58).
1

1
2
3
4

3. The court reserves decision of any issues of admissibility that may arise concerning
the deposition testimony.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 9, 2018

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2