Crisp v. Kelso et al

Filing 19

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/17/17 ordering that in accordance with the court's 11/10/16 order, plaintiff shall file dispositional documents within 21 days from the date of this order. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

OBIE L. CRISP, III,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:15-cv-0763-KJM-EFB P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

J. CLARK KELSO, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42

18

U.S.C. § 1983. On November 10, 2016, a minute order issued, stating that this case had been

19

resolved and ordering plaintiff to file dispositional documents within 30 days. ECF No. 17.

20

Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to facilitate the filing of dispositional documents in this

21

case is grounds for sanctions, including dismissal of this action. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 110 (“Failure

22

of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court may be

23

grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or

24

within the inherent power of the Court.”); Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1263 (9th Cir. 1992)

25

(district court did not abuse discretion in dismissing pro se plaintiff’s complaint for failing to

26

obey an order to re-file an amended complaint to comply with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure);

27

Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988) (dismissal for pro se plaintiff’s failure to

28

comply with local rule regarding notice of change of address affirmed).
1

1

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that in accordance with the court’s November 10,

2

2016 order, plaintiff shall file dispositional documents within 21 days from the date of this order.

3

Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation of dismissal.

4

DATED: January 17, 2017.

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2