Falletti v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 25

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 5/1/2017 that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access To Justice Act (EAJA) in the amount of Five thousand six hundred dollars ($5600.00). (Washington, S)

Download PDF
ELIZABETH L. GADE (SBN: 161495) 1 STEPHEN A. VALIZAN (SBN: 260861) 2 LAW OFFICE OF ELIZABETH GADE, INC. 1900 Point West Way, Suite 208 3 Sacramento, CA 95815 Telephone: (916) 648-8600 4 Facsimile: (916) 648-8601 LAW OFFICE OF ELIZABETH GADE, INC. 1900 POINT WEST WAY, SUITE 208 SACRAMENTO, CA 95815 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LIA IRENE FALLETTI, Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, 14 Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant, 15 No. 2:15-cv-0778-DB STIPULATION AND ORDER 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their assigned counsel, subject to the Court’s approval, that plaintiff be awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, (“EAJA”) in the amount of FIVE THOUSAND, SIX HUNDRED DOLLARS ($5,600.00). This amount represents compensation for all legal services counsel rendered on behalf of Plaintiff in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. section 2412(d), and no costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920; 2412(d). After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to counsel. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 177 L.Ed.2d 91 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER 1 Treasury’s Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine 2 whether they are subject to any offset. 3 Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that 4 Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses LAW OFFICE OF ELIZABETH GADE, INC. 1900 POINT WEST WAY, SUITE 208 SACRAMENTO, CA 95815 5 and costs to be made directly to counsel, pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any 6 payments made shall be delivered to counsel. 7 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA attorney fees 8 and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under EAJA. Payment of the 9 agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff may 10 have relating to EAJA attorney fees and expenses in connection with this action. 11 This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff’s counsel to seek Social Security Act 12 attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406, subject to the offset provisions of the EAJA. 13 14 Respectfully submitted, 15 Dated: April 25, 2017 16 /s/ Stephen A. Valizan_____________ STEPHEN A. VALIZAN Attorney for Plaintiff 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Dated: April 25, 2017 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration By: /s/ Marcelo Illarmo MARCELO ILLARMO (*as authorized via e-mail on April 25, 2017) Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER ORDER 1 2 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, (ECF No. 23), IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 DATED: May 1, 2017 4 /s/ DEBORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE LAW OFFICE OF ELIZABETH GADE, INC. 1900 POINT WEST WAY, SUITE 208 SACRAMENTO, CA 95815 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?