Williams v. Arnold et al
Filing
40
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/19/17: The findings and recommendations filed February 6, 2017 35 are adopted in full. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 24 is granted and this case is dismissed without prejudice. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
LANCE WILLIAMS,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
No. 2:15-cv-0782 JAM DB P
v.
ORDER
ERIC ARNOLD, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se1 and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil
16
17
rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States
18
Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On February 6, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
19
20
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
21
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed
22
objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
23
24
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
25
////
26
1
27
28
On March 3, 2017, attorney Paul Richard Martin filed a “Notice of Appearance” on behalf of
plaintiff. (ECF No. 38.) However, that document was removed from the docket because Mr.
Martin failed to file a Substitution of Counsel signed by plaintiff as required by Local Rule
182(g). To date, Mr. Martin has not filed a Substitution of Counsel.
1
1
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
2
analysis.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1. The findings and recommendations filed February 6, 2017 (ECF No. 35) are adopted in
5
6
full; and
2. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 24) is granted and this case is
7
dismissed without prejudice.
8
DATED: April 19, 2017
9
/s/ John A. Mendez________________________
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?