Kroeung v. Johnson et al
Filing
18
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/8/15 ORDERING that The parties are directed to file a further status report on September 17, 2015 indicating whether a travel document has been signed. If a travel document has n ot been signed by September 17, 2015, Mr. Kroeung is granted leave to file a motion that day for release from custody, to be heard by the undersigned on October 15, 2015 at 10 a.m. If Mr. Kroeung files a motion for release for custody, respondents are directed to file either an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion no later than October 1, 2015. Mr. Kroeungs reply, if any, is due no later than October 8, 2015.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
AUDREY B. HEMESATH
Assistant United States Attorney
501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: (916) 554-2700
Email: Audrey.Hemesath@usdoj.gov
6
7
Attorneys for Respondents
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
) No. 2:15-cv-785 KJN (HC)
)
) Stipulation and Proposed Order
Petitioner,
)
)
v.
)
)
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, et al.,
)
)
Respondents.
)
____________________________________ )
SONGKRA KROEUNG,
17
18
The parties previously stipulated to file a status report in this case on September 2, 2015, indicating
19
any update and, if appropriate, a briefing schedule. Now attached is a declaration from Officer Julius
20
21
Clinton confirming that Petitioner Songra Kroeng remains on the approved travel document list, but
22
indicating that due to unforeseen delay, the travel document itself has not yet been signed by the
23
Cambodian official authorized to sign. The signature is expected to happen within one week. Attachment
24
A at ¶ 7. Once the travel document is signed, it is still estimated that travel will occur within one to two
25
months. Attachment A at ¶ 7.
26
Accordingly, the parties stipulate to file a further status report on September 17, 2015. If a travel
27
28
document has not been signed by September 17, 2015, Mr. Kroeung intends to file a motion that day for
release from custody and calendar it for October 15, 2015, at 10 a.m. If a travel document is signed by
i
1
September 17, 2015, the parties will file a status report that day stating that the travel document has been
2
signed and setting a future date by which time the parties will either file a new status report or Mr.
3
Kroeung will file a motion for release from custody if a firm travel date has not been arranged.
4
5
6
Dated: September 2, 2015
Respectfully submitted,
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
7
8
/s/ Audrey B. Hemesath
AUDREY B. HEMESATH
Assistant United States Attorney
9
10
11
HEATHER WILLIAMS
Federal Defender
12
13
/s/ Carolyn Wiggin
CAROLYN WIGGIN
Assistant Federal Defender
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the joint stipulation, and for the reasons set forth therein, IT IS HEREBY
21
ORDERED that:
22
23
1. The parties are directed to file a further status report on September 17, 2015 indicating
24
whether a travel document has been signed. If a travel document has been signed, the status report
25
shall specify a future date by which the parties will either file a new status report or Mr. Kroeung will
26
file a motion for release from custody if a firm travel date has not been arranged
27
2. If a travel document has not been signed by September 17, 2015, Mr. Kroeung is granted
28
leave to file a motion that day for release from custody, to be heard by the undersigned on October 15,
ii
1
2015 at 10 a.m. If Mr. Kroeung files a motion for release for custody, respondents are directed to file
2
either an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion no later than October 1, 2015.
3
Mr. Kroeung’s reply, if any, is due no later than October 8, 2015.
4
Dated: September 8, 2015
5
6
7
8
/kroe0785.stip.2d
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
iii
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?