Adler v. McDonald et al
Filing
2
ORDER Transferring Case To The Sacramento Division Of The Eastern District Of California, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 4/13/2015. (Fahrney, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
1:15-cv-00554-SKO (PC)
BRENT ADLER,
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE
SACRAMENTO DIVISION OF THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MCDONALD, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to
18
42 U.S.C. ' 1983 on April 10, 2015. In his complaint, plaintiff alleges violations of his civil
19
rights by defendants. The alleged violations took place in Lassen County, which is part of the
20
21
22
23
Sacramento Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.
Therefore, the complaint should have been filed in the Sacramento Division.
Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper
court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper court. Therefore, this action
24
will be transferred to the Sacramento Division.
25
26
27
28
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
California sitting in Sacramento; and
2. All future filings shall refer to the new Sacramento case number assigned and shall be
1
1
filed at:
2
United States District Court
Eastern District of California
501 "I" Street, Suite 4-200
Sacramento, CA, 95814.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated:
April 13, 2015
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?