Santana et al v. County of Yuba et al
Filing
66
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/8/16: Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 9/29/2017. Discovery due by 7/31/2017. All dispositive motions shall be heard no later than 1/12/2018. Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/6/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Jury Trial set for 6/4/2018 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
JESSE I. SANTANA and DAVID
VASQUEZ,
Plaintiff,
13
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)
v.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
No. 2:15-CV-00794 KJM EFB
ORDER
THE COUNTY OF YUBA, YUBA
COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
PATRICK MCGRATH, YUBA COUNTY
DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
MELANIE BENDORF, FORMER YUBA
COUNTY DEPUTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEY JOHN VACEK, YUBA
COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
INVESTIGATOR MARY BARR, YUBA
COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
INVESTIGATOR GENE STOBER,
TIMOTHY J. EVANS, and DOES 1 through
20, inclusive,
22
Defendants.
23
The court held an initial scheduling conference on October 13, 2016. Jaime
24
25
Leanos appeared for plaintiff; Carl Fessenden and Wendy Green appeared for defendant.
Having reviewed the parties’ Joint Status Report filed on October 6, 2016, and
26
27
28
discussed a schedule for the case with counsel at hearing, the court makes the following orders:
/////
1
1
I.
2
SERVICE OF PROCESS
All named defendants have been served and no further service is permitted without
3
leave of court, good cause having been shown.
4
II.
5
JURISDICTION/VENUE
Jurisdiction is predicated upon 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, and 1367. Venue is predicated
6
upon 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2). Jurisdiction and venue are not disputed.
7
III.
8
9
ADDITIONAL PARTIES/AMENDMENTS/PLEADINGS
No further joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings will be permitted without
leave of court, good cause having been shown. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b); Johnson v. Mammoth
10
Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604 (9th Cir. 1992).
11
IV.
12
DISCOVERY
Parties have already completed their initial disclosures as required by Federal Rule
13
of Civil Procedure 26(a). All discovery shall be completed by July 31, 2017. In this context,
14
“completed” means that all discovery shall have been conducted so that all depositions have been
15
taken and any disputes relative to discovery shall have been resolved by appropriate order if
16
necessary and, where discovery has been ordered, the order has been obeyed. All motions to
17
compel discovery must be noticed on the magistrate judge’s calendar in accordance with the local
18
rules of this court. While the assigned magistrate judge reviews proposed discovery phase
19
protective orders, requests to seal or redact are decided by Judge Mueller as discussed in more
20
detail below. In addition, while the assigned magistrate judge handles discovery motions, the
21
magistrate judge cannot change the schedule set in this order, except that the magistrate judge
22
may modify a discovery cutoff to the extent such modification does not have the effect of
23
requiring a change to the balance of the schedule.
24
V.
25
DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES
All counsel are to designate in writing, file with the court, and serve upon all other
26
parties the name, address, and area of expertise of each expert that they propose to tender at trial
27
not later than September 29, 2017. The designation shall be accompanied by a written report
28
prepared and signed by the witness. The report shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B).
2
1
By October 27, 2017, any party who previously disclosed expert witnesses may designate a list
2
of rebuttal expert witnesses to express an opinion on a subject covered by an adverse party’s
3
designated expert, if the rebutting party has not previously retained an expert to testify on that
4
subject. The rebuttal designations shall be accompanied by a written report, which shall also
5
comply with the conditions stated above.
6
Failure of a party to comply with the disclosure schedule as set forth above in all
7
likelihood will preclude that party from calling the expert witness at the time of trial. An expert
8
witness not appearing on the designation will not be permitted to testify unless the party offering
9
the witness demonstrates: (a) that the necessity for the witness could not have been reasonably
10
anticipated at the time the list was proffered; (b) that the court and opposing counsel were
11
promptly notified upon discovery of the witness; and (c) that the witness was promptly made
12
available for deposition.
13
For purposes of this scheduling order, an “expert” is any person who may be used
14
at trial to present evidence under Rules 702, 703 and 705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, which
15
include both “percipient experts” (persons who, because of their expertise, have rendered expert
16
opinions in the normal course of their work duties or observations pertinent to the issues in the
17
case) and “retained experts” (persons specifically designated by a party to be a testifying expert
18
for the purposes of litigation). A party shall identify whether a disclosed expert is percipient,
19
retained, or both. It will be assumed that a party designating a retained expert has acquired the
20
express permission of the witness to be so listed. Parties designating percipient experts must state
21
in the designation who is responsible for arranging the deposition of such persons.
22
All experts designated are to be fully prepared at the time of designation to render
23
an informed opinion, and give the bases for their opinion, so that they can give full and complete
24
testimony at any deposition taken by the opposing party. Experts will not be permitted to testify
25
at trial as to any information gathered or evaluated, or opinion formed, after deposition taken
26
subsequent to designation. All expert discovery shall be completed by November 27, 2017.
27
/////
28
/////
3
1
VI.
MID-LITIGATION STATUS
2
At the parties’ request, the court will hold a mid-litigation status conference on
3
December 8, 2017. The parties shall file a joint status report seven days before the conference.
4
VII.
MOTION HEARING SCHEDULE
5
All dispositive motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining
6
orders or other emergency applications, shall be heard no later than January 12, 2018.1 The
7
parties may obtain available hearing dates by checking Judge Mueller’s page on the court’s
8
website.
9
10
All purely legal issues are to be resolved by timely pretrial motions. Local Rule
230 governs the calendaring and procedures of civil motions; the following provisions also apply:
11
(a)
The opposition and reply must be filed by 4:00 p.m. on the day due; and
12
(b)
When the last day for filing an opposition brief falls on a legal holiday, the
13
opposition brief shall be filed on the last court day immediately preceding the legal holiday.
14
Failure to comply with Local Rule 230(c), as modified by this order, may be deemed consent to
15
the motion and the court may dispose of the motion summarily. Brydges v. Lewis, 18 F.3d 651,
16
652-53 (9th Cir. 1994).
17
The court values the importance of training young attorneys. The parties are
18
encouraged to consider assigning oral argument to a young attorney. If a written request for oral
19
argument is filed before a hearing, stating an attorney of four or fewer years out of law school
20
will argue the oral argument, then the court will ordinarily hold the hearing, although the court’s
21
schedule and calendar may require the hearing to be reset. Otherwise, the court may find it
22
appropriate in some actions to submit a motion without oral argument.
23
The court places a page limit of twenty (20) pages on all moving papers, twenty
24
(20) pages on oppositions, and ten (10) pages for replies. All requests for page limit increases
25
must be made in writing at least fourteen (14) days prior to the filing of the motion.
26
/////
27
28
1
Note that this date may not correspond to a law and motion calendar date.
4
1
Prior to filing a motion in a case in which the parties are represented by counsel,
2
counsel shall engage in a pre-filing meet and confer to discuss thoroughly the substance of the
3
contemplated motion and any potential resolution. Plaintiff’s counsel should carefully evaluate
4
the defendant’s contentions as to deficiencies in the complaint and in many instances the party
5
considering a motion should agree to any amendment that would cure a curable defect. Counsel
6
should discuss the issues sufficiently so that if a motion of any kind is filed, including for
7
summary judgment, the briefing is directed only to those substantive issues requiring resolution
8
by the court. Counsel should resolve minor procedural or other non-substantive matters during
9
the meet and confer. A notice of motion shall contain a certification by counsel filing the
10
motion that meet and confer efforts have been exhausted, with a brief summary of meet and
11
confer efforts.
12
The parties are cautioned that failure to raise a dispositive legal issue that could
13
have been tendered to the court by proper pretrial motion prior to the dispositive motion cut-off
14
date may constitute waiver of such issue.
15
VIII.
16
SEALING
No document will be sealed, nor shall a redacted document be filed, without the
17
prior approval of the court. If a document for which sealing or redaction is sought relates to the
18
record on a motion to be decided by Judge Mueller, the request to seal or redact should be
19
directed to her and not the assigned Magistrate Judge. All requests to seal or redact shall be
20
governed by Local Rules 141 (sealing) and 140 (redaction); protective orders covering the
21
discovery phase of litigation shall not govern the filing of sealed or redacted documents on the
22
public docket. The court will only consider requests to seal or redact filed by the proponent of
23
sealing or redaction. If a party plans to make a filing that includes material an opposing party has
24
identified as confidential and potentially subject to sealing, the filing party shall provide the
25
opposing party with sufficient notice in advance of filing to allow for the seeking of an order of
26
sealing or redaction from the court.
27
/////
28
/////
5
1
IX.
2
FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
The Final Pretrial Conference is set for April 6, 2018, at 10:00 a.m. At least one
3
of the attorneys who will conduct the trial for each of the parties shall attend the Final Pretrial
4
Conference. If by reason of illness or other unavoidable circumstance a trial attorney is unable to
5
attend, the attorney who attends in place of the trial attorney shall have equal familiarity with the
6
case and equal authorization to make commitments on behalf of the client.
7
Counsel for all parties are to be fully prepared for trial at the time of the Final
8
Pretrial Conference, with no matters remaining to be accomplished except production of
9
witnesses for oral testimony. The parties shall confer and file a joint pretrial conference
10
statement by March 16, 2018. The provisions of Local Rule 281 shall apply with respect to the
11
matters to be included in the joint pretrial statement. In addition to those subjects listed in Local
12
Rule 281(b), the parties are to provide the court with the following:
13
14
- A plain, concise statement that identifies every non-discovery motion previously
tendered to the court and its resolution.
15
- A concise, joint list of undisputed core facts that are relevant to each claim.
16
Disputed core facts should then be identified in the same manner. The parties are reminded not to
17
identify every fact in dispute but only those disputed facts that are essential to the formulation of
18
each claim. Each disputed fact and undisputed fact should be separately numbered or lettered.
19
Where the parties are unable to agree on the core disputed facts, they should nevertheless list core
20
disputed facts in the above manner.
21
- Concise lists of disputed evidentiary issues that will be the subject of a party’s
22
motion in limine, and whether the parties believe resolution of any of these motions will be
23
necessary before the first day of trial.
24
- Each party’s points of law, which concisely describe the legal basis or theory
25
underlying their claims and defenses. Points of law should reflect issues derived from the core
26
undisputed and disputed facts. Parties shall not include argument with any point of law; the
27
parties may include concise arguments in their trial briefs.
28
/////
6
1
- A joint statement of the case in plain concise language, which will be read to the
2
jury during voir dire and at the beginning of the trial. The purpose of the joint statement is to
3
inform the jury what the case is about.
4
- The parties’ position on the number of jurors to be impaneled to try the case.
5
Discovery documents to be listed in the pretrial statement shall not include
6
documents to be used only for impeachment and in rebuttal.
7
The parties are reminded that pursuant to Local Rule 281 they are required to
8
attach to the Final Pretrial Conference Statement an exhibit listing witnesses and exhibits they
9
propose to offer at trial. After the name of each witness, each party shall provide a brief
10
statement of the nature of the testimony to be proffered. The parties may file a joint list or each
11
party may file separate lists. These list(s) shall not be contained in the body of the Final Pretrial
12
Conference Statement itself, but shall be attached as separate documents to be used as addenda to
13
the Final Pretrial Order.
14
Plaintiff’s exhibits shall be listed numerically. Defendant’s exhibits shall be listed
15
alphabetically. The parties shall use the standard exhibit stickers provided by the court: pink for
16
plaintiff and blue for defendant. In the event that the alphabet is exhausted, the exhibits shall be
17
marked “AA-ZZ”. However, if the amount of defendant exhibits exceeds “ZZ” exhibits shall be
18
then listed as AAA, BBB, CCC etc. All multi-page exhibits shall be stapled or otherwise fastened
19
together and each page within the exhibit shall be numbered. The list of exhibits shall not include
20
excerpts of depositions to be used only for impeachment. In the event that plaintiff(s) and
21
defendant(s) offer the same exhibit during trial, that exhibit shall be referred to by the designation
22
the exhibit is first identified. The court cautions the parties to pay attention to this detail so that
23
all concerned, including the jury, will not be confused by one exhibit being identified with both a
24
number and a letter. The parties are encouraged to consult concerning exhibits and, to the extent
25
possible, provide joint exhibits, which shall be designated as JX and listed numerically, e.g.,
26
JX-1, JX-2.
27
28
The Final Pretrial Order will contain a stringent standard for the offering at trial of
witnesses and exhibits not listed in the Final Pretrial Order, and the parties are cautioned that the
7
1
standard will be strictly applied. On the other hand, the listing of exhibits or witnesses that a
2
party does not intend to offer will be viewed as an abuse of the court’s processes.
3
4
Counsel shall produce all trial exhibits to Casey Schultz, the Courtroom Deputy,
no later than 3:00 p.m. on the Friday before trial.
5
6
Failure to comply with Local Rule 281, as modified by this order, may be grounds
for sanctions.
7
8
9
The parties also are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure it will be their duty at the Final Pretrial Conference to aid the court in: (a) the
10
formulation and simplification of issues and the elimination of frivolous claims or defenses;
11
(b) the settling of facts that should properly be admitted; and (c) the avoidance of unnecessary
12
proof and cumulative evidence. Counsel must cooperatively prepare the joint Final Pretrial
13
Conference Statement and participate in good faith at the Final Pretrial Conference with these
14
aims in mind.2 A failure to do so may result in the imposition of sanctions which may include
15
monetary sanctions, orders precluding proof, elimination of claims or defenses, or such other
16
sanctions as the court deems appropriate.
17
Concurrently with the filing of the Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statement,
18
counsel shall submit to chambers the word processable version of the Statement, in its entirety
19
(including the witness and exhibit lists) to: kjmorders@caed.uscourts.gov.
20
X.
MOTIONS IN LIMINE
21
All motions in limine must be filed in conjunction with the joint pretrial statement.
22
In most cases, motions in limine are addressed and resolved on the morning of the first day of
23
trial. As noted above, the parties may alert the court at the final pretrial conference and in their
24
final pretrial statement that a particular motion or motions should be resolved earlier. At the final
25
/////
26
27
28
2
“If the pretrial conference discloses that no material facts are in dispute and that the
undisputed facts entitle one of the parties to judgment as a matter of law,” the court may
summarily dispose of the case or claims. Portsmouth Square v. Shareholders Protective Comm.,
770 F.2d 866, 868-69 (9th Cir. 1985).
8
1
pretrial conference, the court will then set a briefing and hearing schedule on these motions in
2
limine as necessary.
3
The parties are reminded that a motion in limine is a pretrial procedural device
4
designed to address the admissibility of evidence. The court looks with disfavor upon
5
dispositional motions presented at the Final Pretrial Conference or at trial in the guise of motions
6
in limine.
7
XI.
TRIAL SETTING
8
9
10
A jury trial in this case is set for June 4, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. The parties estimate a
trial length of approximately ten days. Trial briefs are due by May 21, 2018.
XII.
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
11
No settlement conference is currently scheduled. A settlement conference may be
12
set at the time of the Final Pretrial Conference or at an earlier time at the parties’ request. In the
13
event that an earlier court settlement conference date or referral to the Voluntary Dispute
14
Resolution Program (VDRP) is requested, the parties shall file said request jointly, in writing.
15
Because the case will be tried to a jury, all parties should be prepared to advise the court whether
16
they will stipulate to the trial judge acting as settlement judge and waive disqualification by virtue
17
thereof.
18
Counsel are instructed to have a principal with full settlement authority present at
19
any Settlement Conference or to be fully authorized to settle the matter on any terms. Each judge
20
has different requirements for the submission of settlement conference statements; the appropriate
21
instructions will be sent to you after the settlement judge is assigned.
22
XIII.
23
MODIFICATION OF STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER
The parties are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil
24
Procedure, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order shall not be modified except by leave of court
25
upon a showing of good cause. Agreement of the parties by stipulation alone does not constitute
26
good cause. Except in extraordinary circumstances, unavailability of witnesses or counsel does
27
not constitute good cause.
28
/////
9
1
As noted, the assigned magistrate judge is authorized to modify only the discovery
2
dates shown above to the extent any such modification does not impact the balance of the
3
schedule of the case.
4
XIV. OBJECTIONS TO STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER
5
6
7
8
This Status Order will become final without further order of the court unless
objections are filed within fourteen (14) calendar days of service of this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: November 8, 2016
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
10
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?