Santana et al v. County of Yuba et al

Filing 72

ORDER AFTER HEARING signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/18/17: Motion to Quash is denied, and the alternative request for a protective order is granted in part 68 . By no later than May 24, 2017, the parties shall submit a proposed stipulation for a protective order. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JESSE I. SANTANA, et al.,

12

Plaintiffs,

13
14
15

v.

No. 2:15-cv-794-KJM-EFB

ORDER AFTER HEARING

THE COUNTY OF YUBA, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

This case was before the court on May 17, 2017, for hearing on non-party former

18

Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger’s motion to quash a subpoena served on the California State

19

Archives, or in the alternative for a protective order. See ECF No. 68. Attorney P. Patty Li

20

appeared on behalf of non-party Schwarzenegger, attorney Jaime Leanos appeared on behalf of

21

plaintiffs, and attorney Jeff Nordlander appeared on behalf of defendants County of Yuba, Patrick

22

McGrath, Melanie Bendorf, John Vacek, Mary Barr, and Gene Stober.

23

For the reasons stated on the record, the motion to quash is denied, and the alternative

24

request for a protective order is granted in part. The subpoena shall be limited to any documents

25

submitted by Patrick McGrath, Melanie Bendorf, John Vacek, Mary Barr, Timothy Evans and

26

Julia Scrogin, as suggested by plaintiffs in the parties’ joint statement. See ECF No. 70 at 24. By

27

no later than May 24, 2017, the parties shall submit a proposed stipulation for a protective order

28

governing the production of such documents, as discussed on the record. Within 2 days of the
1

1

court’s issuance of a protective order, the California State Archive shall produce all responsive

2

documents, as limited herein.

3
4

So Ordered.
DATED: May 18, 2017.

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2