Santana et al v. County of Yuba et al

Filing 97

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/11/2018 GRANTING 96 Request for Extension of Pages. Defendants be allowed to up to 30 pages for their Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment Any opposition to said motion may also be up to 30 pages in length; and Any reply shall not exceed 15 pages.(Washington, S)

1
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
2
3
4
5

Carl L. Fessenden, SBN 161494
Lauren E. Calnero, SBN 284655
C.M. Brandon Gnekow, SBN 306669
350 University Avenue, Suite 200
Sacramento, California 95825
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

6
7
8
9

Attorneys for Defendants, THE COUNTY OF YUBA, YUBA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
PATRICK MCGRATH, YUBA COUNTY DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY MELANIE BENDORF,
FORMER YUBA COUNTY DEPUTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY JOHN VACEK, YUBA COUNTY
DISTRICT ATTORNEY INVESTIGATOR MARY BARR AND YUBA COUNTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEY INVESTIGATOR GENE STOBER
[Exempt from Filing Fees Pursuant to Government Code § 610]

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12
13

JESSE I.
VASQUEZ,

14

SANTANA

AND

DAVID

CASE NO. 2:15-cv-00794-KJM-EFB
ORDER
GRANTING
DEFENDANTS’
REQUEST TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT FOR
ITS MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND
AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Plaintiff,

15

v.

16

THE COUNTY OF YUBA, YUBA COUNTY
DISTRICT
ATTORNEY
PATRICK
MCGRATH, YUBA COUNTY DEPUTY
DISTRICT ATTORNEY MELANIE BENDORF,
FORMER
YUBA
COUNTY
DEPUTY
DISTRICT ATTORNEY JOHN VACEK, YUBA
COUNTY
DISTRICT
ATTORNEY
INVESTIGATOR MARY BARR, YUBA
COUNTY
DISTRICT
ATTORNEY
INVESTIGATOR GENE STOBER, THE CITY
OF MARYSVILLE, MARYSVILLE POLICE
DEPARTMENT, MARYSVILLE POLICE
OFFICER RANDALL ELLIOT, YUBA
COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE JULIA
SCROGIN, TIMOTHY J. EVANS, AND DOES
1 THROUGH 20, inclusive;

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Complaint Filed: 04/13/2015
1st Amended Complaint filed: 04/22/2015
2nd Amended Complaint filed: 09/09/2016
3rd Amended Complaint filed: 3/13/2018

26
27

Defendants.
_______________________________________/

28

1
{01834907.DOC}

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT FOR ITS MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND
AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

1

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. Defendants be allowed to up to thirty (30) pages for their Memorandum of Points and

3

Authorities in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment

4

2. Any opposition to said motion may also be up to thirty (30) pages in length; and

5

3. Any reply shall not exceed fifteen (15) pages.

6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7

DATED: June 11, 2018.

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
{01834907.DOC}

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT FOR ITS MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND
AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT