Schultz v. Duffy
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/8/2015 ORDERING the Clerk to send Mr. Schultz the court's forms for an application for writ of habeas corpus and for a civil rights complaint; Mr. Shultz shall file either a petition or complaint within 30 days. Failure to comply will result in this case being closed.(Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RICHARD ORVILLE SCHULTZ,
12
No. 2:15-cv-796-GEB-EFB P
Petitioner,
13
v.
14
BRIAN DUFFY,
15
ORDER
Respondent.
16
This action was opened when Mr. Schultz, a state prisoner without counsel, filed a 340-
17
18
page “motion to protect petitioner against tolling until state remedies are exhausted.” ECF No. 1.
19
On April 17, 2015, the court notified Mr. Schultz that he had not properly commenced a habeas
20
action because he had not filed a petition as required by Rule 3 of the Rules Governing § 2254
21
Cases. ECF No. 5. The court granted Mr. Schultz 30 days within which to file a petition. Id. The
22
time for acting has passed and Mr. Schultz has not filed a petition or otherwise responded to the
23
court’s order. He has, however, requested “assistance from the court,” indicating that he would
24
like to file either a civil rights action or an application for a writ of habeas corpus. See ECF Nos.
25
6, 8, 10.
26
/////
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
2
1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send Mr. Schultz the court’s forms for an
3
application for writ of habeas corpus and for a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42
4
U.S.C.§ 1983.
5
6
7
8
2. Mr. Schultz shall file either a petition for writ of habeas corpus or a civil rights
complaint within 30 days of the date of this order.
3. Failure to comply with this order will result in this case being closed.
DATED: June 8, 2015.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?