Terry et al v. Wasatch Advantage Group, LLC et al
Filing
308
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/17/2023 GRANTING 304 Stipulation for Damages Calculation. (Perdue, C.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Laura L. Ho (SBN 173179)
lho@gbdhlegal.com
Anne Bellows (SBN 293722)
abellows@gbdhlegal.com
Stephanie Tilden (SBN 341486)
stilden@gbdhlegal.com
GOLDSTEIN, BORGEN, DARDARIAN & HO
155 Grand Avenue, Suite 900
Oakland, CA 94612
Tel: (510) 763-9800 ǀ Fax: (510) 835-1417
Andrew Wolff (SBN 195092)
andrew@awolfflaw.com
LAW OFFICES OF ANDREW WOLFF, PC
1615 Broadway, 4th Floor
Oakland, CA 94612
Tel: (510) 834-3300 ǀ Fax: (510) 834-3377
Jesse Newmark (SBN 247488)
jessenewmark@centrolegal.org
CENTRO LEGAL DE LA RAZA
3022 International Blvd., Suite 410
Oakland, CA 94601
Tel: (510) 437-1863 ǀ Fax: (510) 437-9164
17
Jocelyn Larkin (SBN 110817)
jlarkin@impactfund.org
Lindsay Nako (SBN 239090)
lnako@impactfund.org
THE IMPACT FUND
2080 Addison Street, Suite 5
Berkeley, CA 94704
Tel: (510) 845-3473 ǀ Fax: (510) 845-3654
18
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Relators and the Certified Classes
14
15
16
19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
20
21
22
23
24
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel.
DENIKA TERRY, ROY HUSKEY III, and
TAMERA LIVINGSTON, and each of them for
themselves individually, and for all other persons
similarly situated and on behalf of the UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiffs/Relators,
25
26
vs.
27
WASATCH ADVANTAGE GROUP, LLC,
WASATCH PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC.,
WASATCH POOL HOLDINGS, LLC,
CHESAPEAKE APARTMENT HOLDINGS, LLC,
28
Case No.: 2:15-CV-00799-KJM-DB
CLASS ACTION
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING
DAMAGES CALCULATION
Trial Date: None Set
STIPULATION & ORDER RE DAMAGES CALCULATION - CASE NO. 2:15-CV-00799 KJM-DB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
LOGAN PARK APARTMENTS, LLC, LOGAN
PARK APARTMENTS, LP, ASPEN PARK
HOLDINGS, LLC, BELLWOOD JERRON
HOLDINGS, LLC, BELLWOOD JERRON
APARTMENTS, LP, BENT TREE
APARTMENTS, LLC, CALIFORNIA PLACE
APARTMENTS, LLC, CAMELOT LAKES
HOLDINGS, LLC, CANYON CLUB HOLDINGS,
LLC, COURTYARD AT CENTRAL PARK
APARTMENTS, LLC, CREEKSIDE HOLDINGS,
LTD, HAYWARD SENIOR APARTMENTS, LP,
HERITAGE PARK APARTMENTS, LP, OAK
VALLEY APARTMENTS, LLC, OAK VALLEY
HOLDINGS, LP, PEPPERTREE APARTMENT
HOLDINGS, LP, PIEDMONT APARTMENTS,
LP, POINT NATOMAS APARTMENTS, LLC,
POINT NATOMAS APARTMENTS, LP, RIVER
OAKS HOLDINGS, LLC, SHADOW WAY
APARTMENTS, LP, SPRING VILLA
APARTMENTS, LP, SUN VALLEY HOLDINGS,
LTD, VILLAGE GROVE APARTMENTS, LP,
WASATCH QUAIL RUN GP, LLC, WASATCH
PREMIER PROPERTIES, LLC, WASATCH
POOL HOLDINGS III, LLC,
and DOES 1-4,
Defendants.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION & ORDER RE DAMAGES CALCULATION - CASE NO. 2:15-CV-00799 KJM-DB
1
Plaintiffs Denika Terry, Roy Huskey III, and Tamera Livingston on behalf of themselves, the
2
certified classes, and the United States, and Defendants Wasatch Advantage Group, LLC, et al.,
3
stipulate as follows:
4
WHEREAS, on November 23, 2022, the Court issued an order granting Plaintiffs’ Motion
5
for Partial Summary Judgment and denying Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the
6
Alternative Summary Adjudication, or in the Further Alternative, Class Decertification (ECF No.
7
278);
8
9
10
11
WHEREAS, the Court’s November 23 Order held that Defendants are liable to the certified
classes for breach of contract and unfair business practices in violation of California’s Unfair
Competition Law (id. at 14);
WHEREAS, as to Plaintiffs’ class claim for breach of contract, the Court’s November 23
12
Order states, “[D]efendants breached the tenancy addendum by requiring tenants to pay excess rent
13
in the form of charges contained in the ASAs . . . . Plaintiffs were damaged in the amount of the
14
excess rent they were required to pay, which the court will determine in the second phase of this
15
litigation.” (id. at 13-14);
16
WHEREAS, as to Plaintiffs’ class claim for violation of the Unfair Competition Law, the
17
Court’s November 23 order states, “Plaintiffs have suffered injury in the form of lost money or
18
property as a result of defendants’ unlawful practice of requiring plaintiffs to pay additional charges
19
beyond their share of rent set out in the HAP contracts. Here as well, the court will determine exact
20
damages in the second phase of this litigation.” (id. at 14);
21
WHEREAS, Defendants informed Plaintiffs that they plan to argue that Defendants’ costs
22
incurred in providing those additional services to Section 8 tenants should be considered in any
23
damages calculation on the class claims;
24
WHEREAS, Defendants have clarified that they plan to argue that only the value of and costs
25
incurred in providing renters insurance and media packages to Section 8 tenants should be
26
considered in any damages calculation on the class claims in this litigation;
27
28
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs dispute that there is any validity to Defendants’ argument that they are
entitled to an offset for the value of any service and/or the cost of providing any service to Section 8
1
STIPULATION & ORDER RE DAMAGES CALCULATION - CASE NO. 2:15-CV-00799 KJM-DB
1
tenants;
2
WHEREAS, the Parties wish to avoid costly discovery and unnecessary litigation on
3
Plaintiffs’ class claims for breach of contract and violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law
4
by narrowing the scope of the issues;
5
6
7
THEREFORE, THE PARTIES STIPULATE AND JOINTLY REQUEST THAT THE
COURT ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
1.
Defendants reserve their right to argue that the value of the renters’ insurance and
8
media packages received by class tenants and the cost to Defendants of providing renters’ insurance
9
and media packages to class members should be considered in the calculation of any damages or
10
restitution awarded to the class. As to all other services, including RentPlus, security alarms and
11
services, in-unit washers and dryers, uncovered parking, covered parking, parking garages, pet-
12
related services, month-to-month leasing, and storage, Defendants waive any argument that the costs
13
of providing the services or the value of those services are relevant to the calculation of damages or
14
restitution.
15
2.
Defendants’ arguments concerning the value of renters’ insurance and media
16
packages and the cost of providing renters insurance and media packages to Section 8 tenants are
17
limited to the calculation of damages or restitution on Plaintiffs’ certified class claims. Any costs that
18
Defendants incurred to provide additional services are not relevant to Plaintiffs’ claim brought under
19
the False Claims Act.
20
Dated: May 12, 2023
Respectfully submitted,
21
IMPACT FUND
22
/s/ Lindsay Nako
Lindsay Nako
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Relators and the Certified Classes
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: May 12, 2023
Respectfully submitted,
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
/s/ Ryan Matthews (authorization obtained on 5/12/23)
Ryan Matthews
Attorneys for Defendants
2
STIPULATION & ORDER RE DAMAGES CALCULATION - CASE NO. 2:15-CV-00799 KJM-DB
1
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 17, 2023.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION & ORDER RE DAMAGES CALCULATION - CASE NO. 2:15-CV-00799 KJM-DB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?