Pearl Investment Company, LLC v. McPhee et al
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/20/15 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed April 30, 2015, are adopted in full; this action is remanded to the Sacramento County Superior Court; and Plaintiff's motion to remand, 5 and motion to shorten time, 6 are denied as moot. Copy of remand order sent to Sacramento Superior, Case# 15UD01695. CASE CLOSED. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
PEARL INVESTMENT CO., LLC,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:15-cv-00852 KJM AC
v.
ORDER
RHONDA MCPHEE, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Defendants, proceeding pro se, removed the above-entitled action. The matter was
17
18
referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c)(21).
On April 30, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were
19
20
served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings
21
and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 7. Neither party has filed
22
objections to the findings and recommendations.
23
The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602
24
F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.
25
See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed
26
the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by
27
the proper analysis.
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed April 30, 2015, are adopted in full;
3
2. This action is remanded to the Sacramento County Superior Court; and
4
3. Plaintiff’s motion to remand, ECF No. 5, and motion to shorten time, ECF No. 6, are
5
denied as moot.
6
DATED: May 20, 2015.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?