Hicks v. California State Prison DVI

Filing 22

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/30/2016 DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

STEVEN HICKS,

12
13
14

No. 2:15-cv-0871 KJN P
Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER

CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON DVI,

15

Defendant.

16
17

Plaintiff consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C.

18

§ 636(c). By order filed November 12, 2015, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days

19

leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Plaintiff was warned that failure to file an

20

amended complaint may result in the dismissal of this action. (ECF No. 19 at 10.) Thirty days

21

from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise

22

responded to the court’s order.

23

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice.

24

See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

25

Dated: March 30, 2016

26
27
/hick0871.fta

28
1