Andersen v. Social Security Administration
Filing
13
STIPULATION and ORDER to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence Six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/10/15. Upon receipt of the Court's remand order, the Appeals Council will remand the case to an ALJ for a new hearing. CASE CLOSED. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
12
13
JAYE R. ANDERSEN,
14
Plaintiff
15
16
17
18
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
19
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:15-CV-00873-AC
STIPULATION AND ORDER
TO VOLUNTARYREMAND
PURSUANT TO
SENTENCE SIX OF
42 U.S.C. § 405(g)
20
21
THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE, through their undersigned attorneys and with
22
the approval of this Court, that the Commissioner has agreed to voluntarily remand this case for
23
further administrative proceedings, pursuant to sentence six of section 205(g) of the Social
24
Security Act. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
25
The hearing went off the record during the vocational expert testimony and the
26
administrative law judge (ALJ) inadvertently did not come back on the record. Thus, the record
27
of the administrative hearing is incomplete.
28
-1-
1
2
Upon receipt of the Court’s remand order, the Appeals Council will remand the case to an
ALJ for a new hearing.
3
Respectfully submitted,
LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD WHITAKER
4
5
6
Date: 8/7/2015
/s/* Richard A. Whitaker
RICHARD A. WHITAKER
(*by email authorization 8/7/2015)
Date: 8/10/2015
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
7
8
9
10
11
By:
12
13
14
15
16
/s/ Jacob M. Mikow
JACOB M. MIKOW
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Of Counsel:
IN SEON JEONG
Assistant Regional Counsel
17
Attorneys for Defendant
18
19
ORDER
20
21
22
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED:
23
24
DATED: August 10, 2015
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?