Andersen v. Social Security Administration

Filing 13

STIPULATION and ORDER to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence Six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/10/15. Upon receipt of the Court's remand order, the Appeals Council will remand the case to an ALJ for a new hearing. CASE CLOSED. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 12 13 JAYE R. ANDERSEN, 14 Plaintiff 15 16 17 18 v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 19 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:15-CV-00873-AC STIPULATION AND ORDER TO VOLUNTARYREMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE SIX OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) 20 21 THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE, through their undersigned attorneys and with 22 the approval of this Court, that the Commissioner has agreed to voluntarily remand this case for 23 further administrative proceedings, pursuant to sentence six of section 205(g) of the Social 24 Security Act. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). 25 The hearing went off the record during the vocational expert testimony and the 26 administrative law judge (ALJ) inadvertently did not come back on the record. Thus, the record 27 of the administrative hearing is incomplete. 28 -1- 1 2 Upon receipt of the Court’s remand order, the Appeals Council will remand the case to an ALJ for a new hearing. 3 Respectfully submitted, LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD WHITAKER 4 5 6 Date: 8/7/2015 /s/* Richard A. Whitaker RICHARD A. WHITAKER (*by email authorization 8/7/2015) Date: 8/10/2015 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration 7 8 9 10 11 By: 12 13 14 15 16 /s/ Jacob M. Mikow JACOB M. MIKOW Special Assistant United States Attorney Of Counsel: IN SEON JEONG Assistant Regional Counsel 17 Attorneys for Defendant 18 19 ORDER 20 21 22 APPROVED AND SO ORDERED: 23 24 DATED: August 10, 2015 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?