Snipes v. Dollar Tree Distribution, Inc.
Filing
127
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 11/5/2020 GRANTING plaintiff's 121 Motion for Attorney Fees. (Kastilahn, A)
1
7
S. BRETT SUTTON, 143107
brett@suttonhague.com
JARED HAGUE, 251517
jared@suttonhague.com
BRADY BRIGGS 310934
brady@suttonhague.com
SUTTON HAGUE LAW CORPORATION, P.C.
5200 N. Palm Avenue, Suite 203
Fresno, California 93704
Telephone: (559) 325-0500
Facsimile: (559) 981-1217
8
Attorneys for Plaintiff, the Class Members and all Aggrieved Employees
2
3
4
5
6
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
* * *
12
13
TERRY T. SNIPES, SR., an individual, residing
in San Joaquin County, California;
CLASS ACTION
14
Plaintiff,
15
vs.
16
17
Case No. 2:15-cv-00878-MCE-KJN
DOLLAR TREE DISTRIBUTION, INC., a
Virginia Corporation; and Does 1–50, inclusive,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES,
COSTS AND CLASS
REPRESENTATIVE AWARD
19
Date:
October 29, 2020
Time:
2:00 p.m.
Courtroom: 7
20
Judge: Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr.
21
Filed:
April 1, 2015
Removed: April 23, 2015
Trial Date: TBD
18
Defendants.
22
23
24
25
26
27
Sutton Hague
Law Corporation
5200 N. PALM AVENUE
SUITE 203
FRESNO, CA 93704
28
1
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES, COSTS AND CLASS
REPRESENTATIVE AWARD
1
2
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL OF RECORD:
3
The Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, Costs and Class Representative Award came
4
before this Court, the Honorable Morrison C. England, Jr. presiding, on October 29, 2020. The
5
Court having considered the papers submitted in support of the Motion, as well as Defendant’s
6
Statement of Non-Opposition (ECF No. 125), HEREBY ORDERS THE FOLLOWING:
1.
7
The proposed Class Representative Payment of a single payment of Fifteen
8
Thousand Dollars and Zero Cents ($15,000.00), payable to Plaintiff for his service as a Class
9
Representative is finally approved.
2.
10
11
The proposed Class Counsel Award of Seven Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars
and Zero Cents ($750,000.00) in attorneys’ fees payable to Class Counsel is finally approved.
3.
12
The proposed Class Counsel Costs presently of Fifty-Eight Thousand Four
13
Hundred and Seventy-Two Dollars and Forty-Four Cents ($58,472.44) in costs incurred by Class
14
Counsel is finally approved.
4.
15
The Parties and the Settlement Administrator are ordered to comply with the
16
terms of the Settlement as it relates to the funding and distribution of the proposed Class Counsel
17
Award of attorney fees and costs and the Class Representative’s Class Representative Payment.
5.
18
Nothing in this Order will preclude any action to enforce the Parties’ obligations
19
20
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
5200 N. PALM AVENUE
SUITE 203
FRESNO, CA 93704
Inc. fund the amount contemplated hereby in accordance with the Settlement.
21
Sutton Hague
Law Corporation
under the Settlement or under this Order, including the requirement that Dollar Tree Distribution,
///
28
2
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES, COSTS AND CLASS
REPRESENTATIVE AWARD
1
6.
Without affecting the finality of this Order in any way, the Court retains
2
jurisdiction of all matters relating to the interpretation, administration, implementation,
3
effectuation and enforcement of this Order and the Settlement.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: November 5, 2020
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Sutton Hague
Law Corporation
5200 N. PALM AVENUE
SUITE 203
FRESNO, CA 93704
28
3
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES, COSTS AND CLASS
REPRESENTATIVE AWARD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?