Snipes v. Dollar Tree Distribution, Inc.

Filing 127

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 11/5/2020 GRANTING plaintiff's 121 Motion for Attorney Fees. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 7 S. BRETT SUTTON, 143107 brett@suttonhague.com JARED HAGUE, 251517 jared@suttonhague.com BRADY BRIGGS 310934 brady@suttonhague.com SUTTON HAGUE LAW CORPORATION, P.C. 5200 N. Palm Avenue, Suite 203 Fresno, California 93704 Telephone: (559) 325-0500 Facsimile: (559) 981-1217 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff, the Class Members and all Aggrieved Employees 2 3 4 5 6 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 * * * 12 13 TERRY T. SNIPES, SR., an individual, residing in San Joaquin County, California; CLASS ACTION 14 Plaintiff, 15 vs. 16 17 Case No. 2:15-cv-00878-MCE-KJN DOLLAR TREE DISTRIBUTION, INC., a Virginia Corporation; and Does 1–50, inclusive, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES, COSTS AND CLASS REPRESENTATIVE AWARD 19 Date: October 29, 2020 Time: 2:00 p.m. Courtroom: 7 20 Judge: Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr. 21 Filed: April 1, 2015 Removed: April 23, 2015 Trial Date: TBD 18 Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 Sutton Hague Law Corporation 5200 N. PALM AVENUE SUITE 203 FRESNO, CA 93704 28 1 __________________________________________________________________________________________________ ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES, COSTS AND CLASS REPRESENTATIVE AWARD 1 2 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL OF RECORD: 3 The Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, Costs and Class Representative Award came 4 before this Court, the Honorable Morrison C. England, Jr. presiding, on October 29, 2020. The 5 Court having considered the papers submitted in support of the Motion, as well as Defendant’s 6 Statement of Non-Opposition (ECF No. 125), HEREBY ORDERS THE FOLLOWING: 1. 7 The proposed Class Representative Payment of a single payment of Fifteen 8 Thousand Dollars and Zero Cents ($15,000.00), payable to Plaintiff for his service as a Class 9 Representative is finally approved. 2. 10 11 The proposed Class Counsel Award of Seven Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars and Zero Cents ($750,000.00) in attorneys’ fees payable to Class Counsel is finally approved. 3. 12 The proposed Class Counsel Costs presently of Fifty-Eight Thousand Four 13 Hundred and Seventy-Two Dollars and Forty-Four Cents ($58,472.44) in costs incurred by Class 14 Counsel is finally approved. 4. 15 The Parties and the Settlement Administrator are ordered to comply with the 16 terms of the Settlement as it relates to the funding and distribution of the proposed Class Counsel 17 Award of attorney fees and costs and the Class Representative’s Class Representative Payment. 5. 18 Nothing in this Order will preclude any action to enforce the Parties’ obligations 19 20 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 5200 N. PALM AVENUE SUITE 203 FRESNO, CA 93704 Inc. fund the amount contemplated hereby in accordance with the Settlement. 21 Sutton Hague Law Corporation under the Settlement or under this Order, including the requirement that Dollar Tree Distribution, /// 28 2 __________________________________________________________________________________________________ ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES, COSTS AND CLASS REPRESENTATIVE AWARD 1 6. Without affecting the finality of this Order in any way, the Court retains 2 jurisdiction of all matters relating to the interpretation, administration, implementation, 3 effectuation and enforcement of this Order and the Settlement. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: November 5, 2020 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Sutton Hague Law Corporation 5200 N. PALM AVENUE SUITE 203 FRESNO, CA 93704 28 3 __________________________________________________________________________________________________ ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES, COSTS AND CLASS REPRESENTATIVE AWARD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?