Snipes v. Dollar Tree Distribution, Inc.

Filing 38

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 05/16/16 ORDERING that plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint is DEEMED FILED and served upon entry of this Order; defendant shall file and serve its Answer to the Second Amended Complaint within 30 days. (Benson, A)

Download PDF
1 S. BRETT SUTTON 143107 JARED HAGUE 251517 2 JOSEPH V. MACIAS 273168 SUTTON HAGUE LAW CORPORATION, P.C. 3 6715 N. Palm Avenue, Suite 216 Fresno, California 93704 4 Telephone: (559) 325-0500 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff: Terry T. Snipes, Sr., an individual 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 * * * 9 10 TERRY T. SNIPES, SR., an individual, residing in San Joaquin County, California, 11 CLASS ACTION vs. JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S FILING OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANTS’ ANSWERS TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER THEREON 14 DOLLAR TREE DISTRIBUTION, INC., A Virginia Corporation; and Does 1 through 50, 15 inclusive, 16 Judge: Hon. Morrison C. England Plaintiff, 12 13 Case No. 2:15-cv-00878-MCE-KJN Defendants. 17 18 Action Filed: April 1, 2015 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Plaintiff TERRY T. SNIPES, SR. (“Plaintiff”), by and through his counsel of record, and 27 Defendant DOLLAR TREE DISTRIBUTION, INC. (“Defendant”), by and through its counsel Sutton Hague Law Corporation 6715 N. PALM AVENUE SUITE 216 FRESNO, CA 93704 28 of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1 __________________________________________________________________________________________________ JOINT STIPULATION RE PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANT’S ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER THEREON 1 2 RECITALS AND JOINT STIPULATION WHEREAS, Plaintiff desires to file a Second Amended Complaint and has provided 3 Defendant with a copy of the proposed Second Amended Complaint; 4 WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant have conferred in good faith; 5 NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AS FOLLOWS: 6 1. Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint will be deemed filed and served once the Court 7 issues the order approving filing of the Second Amended Complaint, a true and correct copy of 8 which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”. 9 2. Defendant will file and serve its Answer to the Second Amended Complaint within 10 thirty (30) days following entry of the Court’s order granting this joint stipulation. 11 12 DATED: May 16, 2016 __/s/ Jared Hague___ JARED HAGUE SUTTON HAGUE LAW CORPORATION Attorneys for Plaintiff TERRY T. SNIPES, SR. 13 14 15 16 17 DATED: May 16, 2016 18 19 20 _/s/ Lindbergh Porter____________ LINDBERGH PORTER LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant DOLLAR TREE DISTRIBUTION, INC. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Sutton Hague Law Corporation 6715 N. PALM AVENUE SUITE 216 FRESNO, CA 93704 28 2 __________________________________________________________________________________________________ JOINT STIPULATION RE PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANT’S ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER THEREON 1 ORDER 2 Based on the above Stipulation of the Parties and good cause appearing therefor, 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, a true and 4 correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, is deemed filed and served upon entry of 5 this Order. 6 IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED THAT Defendant shall file and serve its Answer 7 to the Second Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days following the date of this Order. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: May 16, 2016 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Sutton Hague Law Corporation 6715 N. PALM AVENUE SUITE 216 FRESNO, CA 93704 28 3 __________________________________________________________________________________________________ JOINT STIPULATION RE PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANT’S ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER THEREON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?