Howell v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 23

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 5/30/2017 AWARDING the plaintiff attorney fees in the amount of $2,295.00 and expenses in the amount of $14.00 under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Lawrence D. Rohlfing Attorney at Law: 119433 Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing 12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115 Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Tel.: (562) 868-5886 Fax: (562) 868-8868 E-mail: rohlfing.office@rohlfinglaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Mark Allen Howell 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARK ALLEN HOWELL, 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 14 15 Defendant. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:15-cv-00879 DB STIPULATION AND ORDRER FOR THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 17 18 19 20 TO THE HONORABLE DEBORAH BARNES, MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their 21 undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Mark Allen Howell 22 be awarded attorney fees in the amount of two thousand two hundred ninety-five 23 dollars ($2,295.00) and expenses in the amount of fourteen dollars ($14.00) under 24 the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and no costs under 25 28 U.S.C. § 1920. This amount represents compensation for all legal services 26 27 28 -1- 1 rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in 2 accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920; 2412(d). 3 After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Mark Allen Howell, the 4 government will consider the matter of Mark Allen Howell's assignment of EAJA 5 fees to Lawrence D. Rohlfing. The retainer agreement containing the assignment 6 is attached as exhibit 1. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2529 (2010), 7 the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to 8 any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset 9 Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine 10 whether they are subject to any offset. 11 Fees shall be made payable to Mark Allen Howell, but if the Department of 12 the Treasury determines that Mark Allen Howell does not owe a federal debt, then 13 the government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made 14 directly to Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, pursuant to the assignment 15 executed by Mark Allen Howell.1 Any payments made shall be delivered to 16 Lawrence D. Rohlfing. 17 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Mark Allen 18 Howell's request for EAJA attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of 19 liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the 20 agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all 21 claims that Mark Allen Howell and/or Lawrence D. Rohlfing including Law 22 Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in 23 connection with this action. 24 25 26 27 28 1 The parties do not stipulate whether counsel for the plaintiff has a cognizable lien under federal law against the recovery of EAJA fees that survives the Treasury Offset Program. -2- 1 This award is without prejudice to the rights of Lawrence D. Rohlfing and/or 2 the Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing to seek Social Security Act attorney fees 3 under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA. DATE: May 12, 2017 Respectfully submitted, 4 LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING 5 /s/ Lawrence D. Rohlfing BY: __________________ Lawrence D. Rohlfing Attorney for plaintiff Mark Allen Howell 6 7 8 9 DATED: May 22, 2017 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney 10 /s/ Richard Rodriguez 11 RICHARD RODRIGUEZ Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (Per e-mail authorization) 12 13 14 15 ORDER 16 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.2 17 18 Dated: May 30, 2017 19 20 21 22 23 DLB:6 DB\orders\orders.soc sec\howell0879.stip.eaja.ord 24 25 2 26 27 28 Despite the stipulation’s language to the contrary, the parties did not submit a copy of the retainer agreement as an exhibit. -3- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?