Howell v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
23
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 5/30/2017 AWARDING the plaintiff attorney fees in the amount of $2,295.00 and expenses in the amount of $14.00 under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). (Michel, G.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Lawrence D. Rohlfing
Attorney at Law: 119433
Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing
12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115
Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
Tel.: (562) 868-5886
Fax: (562) 868-8868
E-mail: rohlfing.office@rohlfinglaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Mark Allen Howell
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MARK ALLEN HOWELL,
12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
14
15
Defendant.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 2:15-cv-00879 DB
STIPULATION AND ORDRER FOR
THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF
ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES
PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL
ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C.
§ 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT
TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920
17
18
19
20
TO THE HONORABLE DEBORAH BARNES, MAGISTRATE JUDGE
OF THE DISTRICT COURT:
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their
21
undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Mark Allen Howell
22
be awarded attorney fees in the amount of two thousand two hundred ninety-five
23
dollars ($2,295.00) and expenses in the amount of fourteen dollars ($14.00) under
24
the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and no costs under
25
28 U.S.C. § 1920. This amount represents compensation for all legal services
26
27
28
-1-
1
rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in
2
accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920; 2412(d).
3
After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Mark Allen Howell, the
4
government will consider the matter of Mark Allen Howell's assignment of EAJA
5
fees to Lawrence D. Rohlfing. The retainer agreement containing the assignment
6
is attached as exhibit 1. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2529 (2010),
7
the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to
8
any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset
9
Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine
10
whether they are subject to any offset.
11
Fees shall be made payable to Mark Allen Howell, but if the Department of
12
the Treasury determines that Mark Allen Howell does not owe a federal debt, then
13
the government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made
14
directly to Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, pursuant to the assignment
15
executed by Mark Allen Howell.1 Any payments made shall be delivered to
16
Lawrence D. Rohlfing.
17
This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Mark Allen
18
Howell's request for EAJA attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of
19
liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the
20
agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all
21
claims that Mark Allen Howell and/or Lawrence D. Rohlfing including Law
22
Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in
23
connection with this action.
24
25
26
27
28
1
The parties do not stipulate whether counsel for the plaintiff has a cognizable lien
under federal law against the recovery of EAJA fees that survives the Treasury
Offset Program.
-2-
1
This award is without prejudice to the rights of Lawrence D. Rohlfing and/or
2
the Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing to seek Social Security Act attorney fees
3
under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA.
DATE: May 12, 2017
Respectfully submitted,
4
LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING
5
/s/ Lawrence D. Rohlfing
BY: __________________
Lawrence D. Rohlfing
Attorney for plaintiff Mark Allen Howell
6
7
8
9
DATED: May 22, 2017
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
10
/s/ Richard Rodriguez
11
RICHARD RODRIGUEZ
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security
(Per e-mail authorization)
12
13
14
15
ORDER
16
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.2
17
18
Dated: May 30, 2017
19
20
21
22
23
DLB:6
DB\orders\orders.soc sec\howell0879.stip.eaja.ord
24
25
2
26
27
28
Despite the stipulation’s language to the contrary, the parties did not submit a copy of the
retainer agreement as an exhibit.
-3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?