Borrett v. Horizon Charter Schools
Filing
29
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/21/16 ORDERING that a Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is SET for Wednesday 5/4/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (CKD) before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. Plaintiff shall file and serve status reports on or before 4/20/16, and defendant shall file and serve a status report on or before 4/27/16. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
NORMA A. BORRETT,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:15-cv-0881 GEB CKD PS (TEMP)
v.
ORDER
HORIZON CHARTER SCHOOLS,
15
Defendant.
16
Plaintiff Norma Borrett is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was, therefore,
17
18
referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
19
On January 28, 2016, defendant filed an answer.1
Accordingly, pursuant to the provisions of Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil
20
21
Procedure, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. A Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is set for Wednesday, May 4, 2016, at
22
23
10:00 a.m., at the United States District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California, in
24
Courtroom No. 24, before the undersigned.
25
////
26
1
27
28
On February 12, 2016, the court received a letter from plaintiff asking that the court wait to
schedule this action to allow time for the parties to explore settlement. The court assumes the
parties have had sufficient time but if additional time is required the parties may request that the
court continue the May 4, 2016 status conference.
1
1
2
2. All parties are required to appear at the Status Conference, either by counsel or, if
proceeding in propria persona, on his or her own behalf.
3
3. Plaintiff shall file and serve status reports on or before April 20, 2016, and defendant
4
shall file and serve a status report on or before April 27, 2016. Each party’s status report shall
5
address all of the following matters:
6
a.
Progress of service of process;
b.
Possible joinder of additional parties;
c.
Possible amendment of the pleadings;
d.
Jurisdiction and venue;
11
e.
Anticipated motions and the scheduling thereof;
12
f.
Anticipated discovery and the scheduling thereof, including disclosure of
expert witnesses;
g.
Future proceedings, including the setting of appropriate cut-off dates for
discovery and for law and motion, and the scheduling of a final pretrial
conference and trial;
h.
Modification of standard pretrial procedures specified by the rules due to
the relative simplicity or complexity of the action;
i.
Whether the case is related to any other case, including matters in
bankruptcy;
j.
Whether the parties will stipulate to the magistrate judge assigned to this
matter acting as settlement judge, waiving any disqualification by virtue of
his so acting, or whether they prefer to have a Settlement Conference
before another magistrate judge;
k.
Whether the parties intend to consent to proceed before a United States
Magistrate Judge; and
l.
Any other matters that may aid in the just and expeditious disposition of
this action.
7
8
9
10
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
/////
27
/////
28
/////
2
1
4. The parties are cautioned that failure to file a status report or failure to appear at the
2
status conference may result in an order imposing an appropriate sanction. See Local Rules 110
3
and 183.
4
Dated: March 21, 2016
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
BVD\borrett0881.stat.conf
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?