T.V. et al v. Sacramento City Unified School District
Filing
32
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/30/17: Discovery cut-off is extended to July 28, 2017 for the purposes of completing the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition noticed by Plaintiffs. Expert disclosure deadline i s extended to September 15, 2017. Supplemental expert disclosure deadline is extended to October 13, 2017. Expert discovery cut-off is extended to November 30, 2017. Joint mid-litigation proposal deadline is extended to December 7, 2017. Mid-litigation Status Conference set for 12/14/2017 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Jay T. Jambeck (SBN 226018)
Mandy G. Leigh (SBN 225748)
LEIGH LAW GROUP, P.C.
870 Market Street, Suite 1157
San Francisco, CA 94102
Telephone: 415-399-9155
Facsimile:
415-795-3733
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
SPINELLI, DONALD & NOTT
A Professional Corporation
Domenic D. Spinelli (SBN: 131192)
Alison W. Winter (SBN: 251084)
815 S Street, Second Floor
Sacramento, CA 95811
Telephone: (916) 448-7888
Facsimile: (916) 448-6888
Attorneys for Defendant
Sacramento City Unified School District
13
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
T.V. and A.V. by and through their guardians
Will Valerio and Jackie Valerio, and Will
Valerio and Jackie Valerio, individually, D.S.
by and through her guardian Arthur Aleman,
I.M. and I.M. by and through their guardians
Jorge Maranon and Isabella Maranon, Jorge
Maranon and Isabella Maranon individually,
D.S. by and through his guardians Adrian
Sanchez and Stephanie Sanchez, J.S. by and
through David Schnetz and Amy Schnetz,
A.S. by and through her guardian Stacey
Swett,
23
24
25
26
27
Case No.: 2:15-cv-00889-KJM-AC
STIPULATION AND ORDER
REGARDING DISCOVERY TIMELINES
Plaintiffs,
vs.
SACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL
DISTRICT,
Defendant.
___________________________
_____/
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY TIMELINES
1
STIPULATION
1
2
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16, Plaintiffs, through their attorneys of record,
3
and Defendant, through its attorneys of record, hereby request that the Court modify the current
4
Scheduling Order as follows:
5
1.
On May 31, 2017, the parties submitted a Stipulation and Proposed Order to Extend
6
Discovery Timelines. Inadvertently and unfortunately, the continued dates to which the parties
7
stipulated were not accurately reflected in the Proposed Order. On June 12, 2017, in approving the
8
parties’ stipulation and entering the Order as provided, the Court understandably relied on those
9
inaccurate dates. The parties now request that the Court enter an Order with their originally agreed-
10
11
upon dates.
2.
Good cause exists to enter an Order with the parties’ originally agreed-upon,
12
continued dates. These dates will continue certain aspects of the discovery timeline beyond the
13
current ordered dates. The parties have worked diligently to complete discovery, including
14
undertaking several rounds of written discovery. Additionally, Defendant noticed and completed
15
the depositions of thirteen of the Plaintiffs/parent representatives. Due to calendar conflicts and
16
other scheduling issues, those depositions occurred over a period of several months and concluded
17
on May 19, 2017. Plaintiffs have noticed a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition to occur after the conclusion of
18
the depositions of Plaintiffs but due to the complexity of the issues involved, along with the
19
logistics of scheduling district employees responsive to the Rule 30(b)(6) categories at this time of
20
year, additional time will be necessary for the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition to conclude within the
21
present discovery schedule. With discovery continued for the purposes of this deposition, it is
22
appropriate to similarly extend the timeline for the remainder of discovery so that the parties may
23
fully prepare for trial.
24
3.
Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND REQUESTED, by
25
and between all parties through their respective counsel of record that the Court enter the following
26
dates, as presented in the May 31 2017 Stipulation:
27
28
a.
Discovery cut-off be extended for the purposes of completing the Rule
30(b)(6) deposition noticed by Plaintiffs, Notice of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, only. This
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY TIMELINES
2
1
deposition will be completed by July 28, 2017.
2
b.
Expert disclosure deadline be extended to September 15, 2017
3
c.
Supplemental expert disclosure deadline be extended to October 13, 2017
4
d.
Expert discovery cut-off be extended to November 30, 2017
5
e.
Joint mid-litigation proposal deadline extended to December 7, 2017
6
f.
Mid-litigation status conference extended to December 14, 2017 at 2:30 pm
7
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
8
9
DATED: June 23, 2017
LEIGH LAW GROUP, P.C.
10
By:
11
12
_
/s/ Jay T. Jambeck __________
Jay T. Jambeck
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
13
14
DATED: June 23, 2017
SPINELLI, DONALD & NOTT
15
16
17
By:
___/s/ Domenic D. Spinelli
Domenic D. Spinelli
Alison W. Winter.
Attorneys for Defendant
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY TIMELINES
3
ORDER
1
2
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and for good cause shown thereby, the request to
3
continue the dates set forth in the June 12, 2017 scheduling order is GRANTED. It is hereby
4
ORDERED that:
5
a.
Discovery cut-off be extended for the purposes of completing the Rule
6
30(b)(6) deposition noticed by Plaintiffs, Notice of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A,
7
only. This deposition will be completed by July 28, 2017.
8
b.
Expert disclosure deadline be extended to September 15, 2017
9
c.
Supplemental expert disclosure deadline be extended to October 13, 2017
10
d.
Expert discovery cut-off be extended to November 30, 2017
11
e.
Joint mid-litigation proposal deadline extended to December 7, 2017
12
f.
Mid-litigation status conference extended to December 14, 2017 at 2:30 pm
13
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: June 30, 2017.
15
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY TIMELINES
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?