T.V. et al v. Sacramento City Unified School District

Filing 32

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/30/17: Discovery cut-off is extended to July 28, 2017 for the purposes of completing the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition noticed by Plaintiffs. Expert disclosure deadline i s extended to September 15, 2017. Supplemental expert disclosure deadline is extended to October 13, 2017. Expert discovery cut-off is extended to November 30, 2017. Joint mid-litigation proposal deadline is extended to December 7, 2017. Mid-litigation Status Conference set for 12/14/2017 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Jay T. Jambeck (SBN 226018) Mandy G. Leigh (SBN 225748) LEIGH LAW GROUP, P.C. 870 Market Street, Suite 1157 San Francisco, CA 94102 Telephone: 415-399-9155 Facsimile: 415-795-3733 Attorneys for Plaintiffs SPINELLI, DONALD & NOTT A Professional Corporation Domenic D. Spinelli (SBN: 131192) Alison W. Winter (SBN: 251084) 815 S Street, Second Floor Sacramento, CA 95811 Telephone: (916) 448-7888 Facsimile: (916) 448-6888 Attorneys for Defendant Sacramento City Unified School District 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 T.V. and A.V. by and through their guardians Will Valerio and Jackie Valerio, and Will Valerio and Jackie Valerio, individually, D.S. by and through her guardian Arthur Aleman, I.M. and I.M. by and through their guardians Jorge Maranon and Isabella Maranon, Jorge Maranon and Isabella Maranon individually, D.S. by and through his guardians Adrian Sanchez and Stephanie Sanchez, J.S. by and through David Schnetz and Amy Schnetz, A.S. by and through her guardian Stacey Swett, 23 24 25 26 27 Case No.: 2:15-cv-00889-KJM-AC STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY TIMELINES Plaintiffs, vs. SACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant. ___________________________ _____/ 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY TIMELINES 1 STIPULATION 1 2 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16, Plaintiffs, through their attorneys of record, 3 and Defendant, through its attorneys of record, hereby request that the Court modify the current 4 Scheduling Order as follows: 5 1. On May 31, 2017, the parties submitted a Stipulation and Proposed Order to Extend 6 Discovery Timelines. Inadvertently and unfortunately, the continued dates to which the parties 7 stipulated were not accurately reflected in the Proposed Order. On June 12, 2017, in approving the 8 parties’ stipulation and entering the Order as provided, the Court understandably relied on those 9 inaccurate dates. The parties now request that the Court enter an Order with their originally agreed- 10 11 upon dates. 2. Good cause exists to enter an Order with the parties’ originally agreed-upon, 12 continued dates. These dates will continue certain aspects of the discovery timeline beyond the 13 current ordered dates. The parties have worked diligently to complete discovery, including 14 undertaking several rounds of written discovery. Additionally, Defendant noticed and completed 15 the depositions of thirteen of the Plaintiffs/parent representatives. Due to calendar conflicts and 16 other scheduling issues, those depositions occurred over a period of several months and concluded 17 on May 19, 2017. Plaintiffs have noticed a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition to occur after the conclusion of 18 the depositions of Plaintiffs but due to the complexity of the issues involved, along with the 19 logistics of scheduling district employees responsive to the Rule 30(b)(6) categories at this time of 20 year, additional time will be necessary for the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition to conclude within the 21 present discovery schedule. With discovery continued for the purposes of this deposition, it is 22 appropriate to similarly extend the timeline for the remainder of discovery so that the parties may 23 fully prepare for trial. 24 3. Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND REQUESTED, by 25 and between all parties through their respective counsel of record that the Court enter the following 26 dates, as presented in the May 31 2017 Stipulation: 27 28 a. Discovery cut-off be extended for the purposes of completing the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition noticed by Plaintiffs, Notice of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, only. This STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY TIMELINES 2 1 deposition will be completed by July 28, 2017. 2 b. Expert disclosure deadline be extended to September 15, 2017 3 c. Supplemental expert disclosure deadline be extended to October 13, 2017 4 d. Expert discovery cut-off be extended to November 30, 2017 5 e. Joint mid-litigation proposal deadline extended to December 7, 2017 6 f. Mid-litigation status conference extended to December 14, 2017 at 2:30 pm 7 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 8 9 DATED: June 23, 2017 LEIGH LAW GROUP, P.C. 10 By: 11 12 _ /s/ Jay T. Jambeck __________ Jay T. Jambeck Attorneys for Plaintiffs 13 14 DATED: June 23, 2017 SPINELLI, DONALD & NOTT 15 16 17 By: ___/s/ Domenic D. Spinelli Domenic D. Spinelli Alison W. Winter. Attorneys for Defendant 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY TIMELINES 3 ORDER 1 2 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and for good cause shown thereby, the request to 3 continue the dates set forth in the June 12, 2017 scheduling order is GRANTED. It is hereby 4 ORDERED that: 5 a. Discovery cut-off be extended for the purposes of completing the Rule 6 30(b)(6) deposition noticed by Plaintiffs, Notice of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, 7 only. This deposition will be completed by July 28, 2017. 8 b. Expert disclosure deadline be extended to September 15, 2017 9 c. Supplemental expert disclosure deadline be extended to October 13, 2017 10 d. Expert discovery cut-off be extended to November 30, 2017 11 e. Joint mid-litigation proposal deadline extended to December 7, 2017 12 f. Mid-litigation status conference extended to December 14, 2017 at 2:30 pm 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: June 30, 2017. 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY TIMELINES 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?