Parker-Liles et al v. Garcia et al

Filing 62

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/1/2020 CONTINUING the Trial Date to 10/5/2020 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman, and the Final Pretrial Conference to 9/8/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. The Joint Pretrial Statement, Exhibit List, Witness List, Trial Briefs, Motions in Limine, Proposed Voir Dire, Proposed Jury Instructions, and Proposed Verdict Forms are due no later than 8/10/2020. Oppositions to motions in limine, Objections to proposed voir dire, and Objections to proposed jury instructions shall be filed no later than 8/24/2020. (Huang, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 180 Montgomery Street, Suite 1200 San Francisco, California 94104 ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP 8 11 12 13 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq. (SBN 69888) Airport Corporate Centre 7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120 Oakland, California 94621 Telephone: (510) 839-5200 Facsimile: (510) 839-3882 john.burris@johnburrislaw.com LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS DEWITT M. LACY, Esq. (SBN 258789) K. CHIKE ODIWE, Esq. (SBN 315109) 9701 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1000 Beverly Hills, California 90212 Telephone: (310) 601-7070 Facsimile: (510) 839-3882 dewitt.lacy@johnburrislaw.com chike.odiwe@johnburrislaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs CIARRA PARKER-LILES MARQUITA FIGURES 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 DALE L. ALLEN, JR., State Bar No. 145279 dallen@aghwlaw.com KEVIN P. ALLEN, State Bar No. 252290 kallen@aghwlaw.com JOHN B. ROBINSON, State Bar No. 297065 jrobinson@aghwlaw.com ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP 180 Montgomery Street, Suite 1200 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 697-2000 Facsimile: (415) 813-2045 Attorneys for Defendant STEVEN GARCIA and SHANE RAFTERY 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 23 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 24 SACRAMENTO COURTHOUSE 25 26 27 28 1 386294.1 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE 2:15-CV-00894-KJN 1 CIARRA PARKER-LILES, an individual; MARQUITA FIGURES, an individual, 2 Plaintiffs, 3 Case No.: 2:15-cv-00894-KJN STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND TRIAL DATES v. 4 5 6 7 Date: Time: Ctrm: July 13, 2020 9:00 a.m. 25 9 Defendants. 10 180 Montgomery Street, Suite 1200 San Francisco, California 94104 ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP 8 Hon. Kendall Newman STEVEN GARCIA, individually and in his capacity as an officer for the Fairfield Police Department; SHANE RAFTERY, individually and in his capacity as an officer for the Fairfield Police Department; DOES, 1-10, inclusive, individually and in their capacities as officers for the Fairfield Police Department, 11 Plaintiffs, CIARRA PARKER-LILES and MARQUITA FIGURES (“Plaintiffs”), by and 12 though their respective counsel, and defendants STEVEN GARCIA and SHANE RAFTERY 13 (“Defendants”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 14 1. Whereas this matter is currently set for a jury trial on August 14, 2020, at 9:00 15 a.m., before the Honorable Kendall Newman in Courtroom No. 25 of the above16 entitled Court; 17 2. Whereas this matter is currently set for a final pretrial conference on July 13, 2020, 18 at 10:00 a.m., before the Honorable Kendall Newman in Courtroom No. 25 of the 19 above-entitled Court; 20 3. Whereas a joint pretrial statement, exhibit list, witness list, trial brief, motions in 21 limine, proposed voir dire, proposed jury instructions, and proposed verdict forms 22 were due on June 15, 2020; 23 4. Whereas the parties confirmed with the Courtroom Deputy that the above-entitled 24 Courthouse is currently closed with no set date to reopen due to the COVID-19 25 health crisis; 26 5. Whereas the parties have conferred and have agreed to continue trial in this matter 27 and as such agree, by and through their respective counsel, to the following dates: 28 2 386294.1 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE 2:15-CV-00894-KJN 1 a. Trial date: October 5, 2020 2 b. Final pretrial conference: September 7, 2020 3 c. Date to submit a joint pretrial statement, exhibit list, witness list, trial brief, 4 motions in limine, proposed voir dire, proposed jury instructions, and 5 proposed verdict forms: August 10, 2020. 6 7 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that good cause exists to continue the trial in this matter as described above. 9 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 10 180 Montgomery Street, Suite 1200 San Francisco, California 94104 ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP 8 11 Dated: June 29, 2020 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS 12 13 By: 14 15 16 /s/ Dewitt M. Lacy JOHN L. BURRIS DEWITT M. LACY K. CHIKE ODIWE Attorney for Plaintiffs CIARRA PARKER-LILES and MARQUITA FIGURES 17 18 Dated: June 29, 2020 19 20 ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP By: 21 22 23 /s/ John B. Robinson DALE L. ALLEN, JR. KEVIN P. ALLEN JOHN B. ROBINSON Attorneys for Defendants STEVEN GARCIA and SHANE RAFTERY 24 25 26 27 28 3 386294.1 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE 2:15-CV-00894-KJN 1 ORDER GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the trial date set for August 14, 2020, is hereby vacated 2 3 and continued to October 5, 2020, at 9:00 a.m., in Department 25 of the above-entitled Court, and 4 a final pretrial conference is set for September 8, 2020, at 10:00 a.m., in Department 25 of the 5 above-entitled Court. The joint pretrial statement, exhibit list, witness list, trial briefs, motions in 6 limine, proposed voir dire, proposed jury instructions, and proposed verdict forms are due no later 7 than August 10, 2020. Additionally, oppositions to motions in limine, objections to proposed voir dire, and 9 objections to proposed jury instructions shall be filed no later than August 24, 2020. IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 180 Montgomery Street, Suite 1200 San Francisco, California 94104 ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP 8 11 Dated: July 1, 2020 12 13 /894.joint stip 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 386294.1 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE 2:15-CV-00894-KJN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?