Parker-Liles et al v. Garcia et al
Filing
62
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/1/2020 CONTINUING the Trial Date to 10/5/2020 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman, and the Final Pretrial Conference to 9/8/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. The Joint Pretrial Statement, Exhibit List, Witness List, Trial Briefs, Motions in Limine, Proposed Voir Dire, Proposed Jury Instructions, and Proposed Verdict Forms are due no later than 8/10/2020. Oppositions to motions in limine, Objections to proposed voir dire, and Objections to proposed jury instructions shall be filed no later than 8/24/2020. (Huang, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
9
10
180 Montgomery Street, Suite 1200
San Francisco, California 94104
ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP
8
11
12
13
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq. (SBN 69888)
Airport Corporate Centre
7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120
Oakland, California 94621
Telephone: (510) 839-5200
Facsimile: (510) 839-3882
john.burris@johnburrislaw.com
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
DEWITT M. LACY, Esq. (SBN 258789)
K. CHIKE ODIWE, Esq. (SBN 315109)
9701 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1000
Beverly Hills, California 90212
Telephone: (310) 601-7070
Facsimile: (510) 839-3882
dewitt.lacy@johnburrislaw.com
chike.odiwe@johnburrislaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
CIARRA PARKER-LILES
MARQUITA FIGURES
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
DALE L. ALLEN, JR., State Bar No. 145279
dallen@aghwlaw.com
KEVIN P. ALLEN, State Bar No. 252290
kallen@aghwlaw.com
JOHN B. ROBINSON, State Bar No. 297065
jrobinson@aghwlaw.com
ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP
180 Montgomery Street, Suite 1200
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
(415) 697-2000
Facsimile:
(415) 813-2045
Attorneys for Defendant
STEVEN GARCIA and SHANE RAFTERY
22
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
23
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
24
SACRAMENTO COURTHOUSE
25
26
27
28
1
386294.1
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE TRIAL DATE
2:15-CV-00894-KJN
1
CIARRA PARKER-LILES, an individual;
MARQUITA FIGURES, an individual,
2
Plaintiffs,
3
Case No.: 2:15-cv-00894-KJN
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING
FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND
TRIAL DATES
v.
4
5
6
7
Date:
Time:
Ctrm:
July 13, 2020
9:00 a.m.
25
9
Defendants.
10
180 Montgomery Street, Suite 1200
San Francisco, California 94104
ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP
8
Hon. Kendall Newman
STEVEN GARCIA, individually and in
his capacity as an officer for the Fairfield
Police Department; SHANE RAFTERY,
individually and in his capacity as an
officer for the Fairfield Police
Department; DOES, 1-10, inclusive,
individually and in their capacities as
officers for the Fairfield Police
Department,
11
Plaintiffs, CIARRA PARKER-LILES and MARQUITA FIGURES (“Plaintiffs”), by and
12
though their respective counsel, and defendants STEVEN GARCIA and SHANE RAFTERY
13
(“Defendants”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
14
1. Whereas this matter is currently set for a jury trial on August 14, 2020, at 9:00
15
a.m., before the Honorable Kendall Newman in Courtroom No. 25 of the above16
entitled Court;
17
2. Whereas this matter is currently set for a final pretrial conference on July 13, 2020,
18
at 10:00 a.m., before the Honorable Kendall Newman in Courtroom No. 25 of the
19
above-entitled Court;
20
3. Whereas a joint pretrial statement, exhibit list, witness list, trial brief, motions in
21
limine, proposed voir dire, proposed jury instructions, and proposed verdict forms
22
were due on June 15, 2020;
23
4. Whereas the parties confirmed with the Courtroom Deputy that the above-entitled
24
Courthouse is currently closed with no set date to reopen due to the COVID-19
25
health crisis;
26
5. Whereas the parties have conferred and have agreed to continue trial in this matter
27
and as such agree, by and through their respective counsel, to the following dates:
28
2
386294.1
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE TRIAL DATE
2:15-CV-00894-KJN
1
a. Trial date: October 5, 2020
2
b. Final pretrial conference: September 7, 2020
3
c. Date to submit a joint pretrial statement, exhibit list, witness list, trial brief,
4
motions in limine, proposed voir dire, proposed jury instructions, and
5
proposed verdict forms: August 10, 2020.
6
7
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that good cause exists to continue the trial in this matter as
described above.
9
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
10
180 Montgomery Street, Suite 1200
San Francisco, California 94104
ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP
8
11
Dated: June 29, 2020
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
12
13
By:
14
15
16
/s/ Dewitt M. Lacy
JOHN L. BURRIS
DEWITT M. LACY
K. CHIKE ODIWE
Attorney for Plaintiffs
CIARRA PARKER-LILES and MARQUITA
FIGURES
17
18
Dated: June 29, 2020
19
20
ALLEN, GLAESSNER,
HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP
By:
21
22
23
/s/ John B. Robinson
DALE L. ALLEN, JR.
KEVIN P. ALLEN
JOHN B. ROBINSON
Attorneys for Defendants
STEVEN GARCIA and SHANE RAFTERY
24
25
26
27
28
3
386294.1
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE TRIAL DATE
2:15-CV-00894-KJN
1
ORDER
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the trial date set for August 14, 2020, is hereby vacated
2
3
and continued to October 5, 2020, at 9:00 a.m., in Department 25 of the above-entitled Court, and
4
a final pretrial conference is set for September 8, 2020, at 10:00 a.m., in Department 25 of the
5
above-entitled Court. The joint pretrial statement, exhibit list, witness list, trial briefs, motions in
6
limine, proposed voir dire, proposed jury instructions, and proposed verdict forms are due no later
7
than August 10, 2020.
Additionally, oppositions to motions in limine, objections to proposed voir dire, and
9
objections to proposed jury instructions shall be filed no later than August 24, 2020.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
180 Montgomery Street, Suite 1200
San Francisco, California 94104
ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP
8
11
Dated: July 1, 2020
12
13
/894.joint stip
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
386294.1
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE TRIAL DATE
2:15-CV-00894-KJN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?