Heydt, et al. v. CitiMortgage, Inc., et al.

Filing 11

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 5/28/15 re: 10 EXTENDING Citi's answer or otherwise response to the Complaint to 7/20/15. (Meuleman, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

MAYER BROWN LLP
JOHN NADOLENCO (SBN 181128)
[e-mail]
STEVEN E. RICH (SBN 198412)
[e-mail]
350 South Grand Avenue, 25th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1503
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

DAVID T. HEYDT and JENNIFER
F. HEYDT, individually, and on
behalf of the general public,
Plaintiffs,

13

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

v.

14
15

Case No. 2:15-CV-00909-WBS-KJN

CITIMORTGAGE, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

-1-

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT;
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-00909-WBS-KJN
716294783.1

1

This Stipulation is entered into by and between Defendant CitiMortgage,

2

Inc. (“Citi”), and Plaintiffs David T. Heydt and Jennifer F. Heydt (the “Plaintiffs,”

3

and collectively with Citi, the “Parties”), as follows:

4

RECITALS

5
6

against Citi and others.

7
8
9

12
13

registered agent, making June 5, 2015 Citi’s present deadline to respond to the
Complaint.

16

and the schedule of counsel for the Parties, the Parties have conferred and agreed
to extend Citi’s time for responding to the Complaint through and including July
20, 2015.

and except as described herein, this Stipulation will have no effect on the schedule
for this case.
AGREEMENT

18

NOW, THEREFORE, based upon the foregoing and subject to Court
approval, the Parties hereby STIPULATE AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

20
21

1.

The Parties incorporate by reference each of the Recitals contained in

paragraphs A through D hereinabove as if set forth in full herein.

22
23

Citi has not previously requested any extensions of time in this case,

D.

17

19

Given the number of issues in the 157-paragraph, 6-count Complaint

C.

14
15

On May 15, 2015, Plaintiffs served their Complaint on Citi’s

B.

10
11

On April 27, 2015, Plaintiffs filed their Complaint (the “Complaint”)

A.

2.

The time for Citi to move, answer or otherwise respond to the

Complaint is extended to and includes July 20, 2015.

24
///
25
///
26
27
-2-

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT;
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-00909-WBS-KJN
716294783.1

1
2
3

3.

The Parties agree that by entering into this Stipulation, neither Party

waives any right or remedy.
Dated: May 27, 2015

MAYER BROWN LLP

4

By: /s/ Steven E. Rich
Steven E. Rich
Attorneys for Defendant
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.

5
6
7
8

Dated: May 27, 2015

9

CONSUMERS FIRST ATTORNEYS, LLP
By: /s/ Jeremy K. Heeber (as authorized on
5/27/15)
Jeremy K. Heebner
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DAVID T. HEYDT and JENNIFER F.
HEYDT

10
11
12
13
14

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

15
16

Dated: May 28, 2015

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
-3-

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT;
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-00909-WBS-KJN
716294783.1