Reyes et al v. Osborne et al

Filing 69

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/15/2017 DISMISSING this action, with prejudice, pursuant to F.R.Cv.P. Rule 41(a)(2); ORDERING each party to bear his/her/its own fees and costs. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 DANA A. SUNTAG, State Bar Number: 125127 JOSHUA J. STEVENS, State Bar Number: 238105 HERUM\CRABTREE\SUNTAG A California Professional Corporation 5757 Pacific Avenue, Suite 222 Stockton, California 95207 Telephone: (209) 472-7700 Facsimile: (209) 472-7986 dsuntag@herumcrabtree.com jstevens@herumcrabtree.com 6 7 Attorneys for Defendant TERESA WENTLAND 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAMIRO REYES, et al, 12 Plaintiffs, 13 14 v. JOSEPH OSBORNE, et al., Defendants. 15 16 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL Case No.: 2:15-CV-00932-JAM-CKD STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE CASE WITH PREJUDICE [no hearing required] 1 IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiffs and the only 2 remaining Defendant to this action, Teresa Wentland, through their undersigned 3 counsel of record, that this entire action be dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear 4 his/her/its own fees and costs, including without limitation attorneys’ fees, pursuant to 5 Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 6 Dated: August 11, 2017 7 By: ____/s/ Dana A. Suntag____________ DANA A. SUNTAG Attorneys for All Defendants 8 9 10 Dated: August 14, 2017 11 13 15 LAW OFFICES OF CHE L. HASHIM By: ____/s/ Frear Stephen Schmid__________ FREAR STEPHEN SCHMID Attorneys for All Plaintiffs ORDER 12 14 HERUM\CRABTREE\SUNTAG A California Professional Corporation IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 8/15/17 16 /s/ John A. Mendez_____________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?