Reyes et al v. Osborne et al
Filing
69
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/15/2017 DISMISSING this action, with prejudice, pursuant to F.R.Cv.P. Rule 41(a)(2); ORDERING each party to bear his/her/its own fees and costs. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G.)
1
2
3
4
5
DANA A. SUNTAG, State Bar Number: 125127
JOSHUA J. STEVENS, State Bar Number: 238105
HERUM\CRABTREE\SUNTAG
A California Professional Corporation
5757 Pacific Avenue, Suite 222
Stockton, California 95207
Telephone: (209) 472-7700
Facsimile: (209) 472-7986
dsuntag@herumcrabtree.com
jstevens@herumcrabtree.com
6
7
Attorneys for Defendant
TERESA WENTLAND
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RAMIRO REYES, et al,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
v.
JOSEPH OSBORNE, et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL
Case No.: 2:15-CV-00932-JAM-CKD
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE CASE WITH
PREJUDICE
[no hearing required]
1
IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiffs and the only
2
remaining Defendant to this action, Teresa Wentland, through their undersigned
3
counsel of record, that this entire action be dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear
4
his/her/its own fees and costs, including without limitation attorneys’ fees, pursuant to
5
Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
6
Dated: August 11, 2017
7
By: ____/s/ Dana A. Suntag____________
DANA A. SUNTAG
Attorneys for All Defendants
8
9
10
Dated: August 14, 2017
11
13
15
LAW OFFICES OF CHE L. HASHIM
By: ____/s/ Frear Stephen Schmid__________
FREAR STEPHEN SCHMID
Attorneys for All Plaintiffs
ORDER
12
14
HERUM\CRABTREE\SUNTAG
A California Professional Corporation
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 8/15/17
16
/s/ John A. Mendez_____________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?