Hugunin et al v. Rocklin Unified School District et al

Filing 72

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/21/16 ORDERING that Defendants' MOTION to Compel 56 is GRANTED; The City of Rocklin shall produce responsive documents to defendants within fourteen days of the date of this order; and The responsive documents shall be produced subject to a stipulated protective order. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JENNIFER HUGUNIN, et al., 12 Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 No. 2:15-cv-00939 MCE AC (TEMP) v. ORDER ROCKLIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 On March 9, 2016, this matter came before the undersigned for hearing of defendants’ 18 19 motion to compel. Attorneys Carol Weichowski and Mark O’Dea appeared on behalf of the 20 defendants and attorney Dee Ann Marie Watkins Gillick appeared on behalf of non-party City of 21 Rocklin. Upon consideration of the arguments on file and at the hearing, and for the reasons set 22 23 forth on the record at the hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. Defendants’ January 26, 2016 motion to compel (Dkt. No. 56) is granted; 25 2. The City of Rocklin shall produce responsive documents to defendants within fourteen 26 days of the date of this order; and 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 2 3. The responsive documents shall be produced subject to a stipulated protective order.1 DATED: March 21, 2016. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 The parties have submitted a stipulated protective order which the court shall enter separately. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?