Hugunin et al v. Rocklin Unified School District et al

Filing 78

ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR THE IDENTIFICATION AND PRESERVATION OF THE CONFIDENTIALITY OF DOCUMENTS signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 03/29/16. (Benson, A)

1
2
3

LONGYEAR, O’DEA & LAVRA, LLP
3620 American River Drive, Suite 230
Sacramento, CA 95864
Phone: [phone]
Facsimile: 916-974-8510

5

Gregory P. O’Dea, CSB No. 110966
Mark P. O’Dea, CSB No. 186061
Natasha N. Langenfeld, CSB No. 250944

6

Attorneys for Defendant, Sherry McDaniel

4

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

)
JENNIFER HUGUNIN, PATRICK
HUGUNIN, D.H., a minor by and through his )
)
guardian ad litem JENNIFER HUGUNIN;
KEITH CALDWELL, NICOLE HILL, X.C. )
a minor by and through his guardian ad litem )
)
KEITH CALDWELL; TRISHIA PITTS,
CARL PITTS, N.P., a minor by and through )
his guardian ad litem TRISHIA PITTS; TODD )
VROOMAN, LAURA VROOMAN, S.V., a )
)
minor by and through his guardian ad litem
TODD VROOMAN; RICHARD ROGERS, )
)
TERRILL ROGERS, P.R, a minor by and
)
through his guardian ad litem RICHARD
ROGERS; MICHELLE MANCOUR and G.I., )
a minor by and through his guardian ad litem )
)
MICHELLE MANCOUR,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
ROCKLIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT )
)
SHERRY MCDANIEL, CHARLES
)
THIBIDEAU, BETTY JO WESSINGER,
)
JANNA CAMBRA, KEVIN BROWN,
ROGER STOCK, DR. TODD CUTLER, and )
)
Does 1-30, Inclusively,
)
)
Defendants.
)

CASE NO. 2:15-cv-00939-MCE-DAD
ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR THE
IDENTIFICATION AND PRESERVATION OF
THE CONFIDENTIALITY OF DOCUMENTS

27

The parties to the above-captioned action, through their counsel of record, entered into a

28

Stipulation for the Identification and Preservation of the Confidentiality of Documents, which was
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
[Proposed] Order re Stipulation for the Identification and Preservation of the Confidentiality of Documents
Page 1

1

previously filed on November 4, 2015 (Docket No. 41), (a true and correct copy of which is attached

2

hereto as Exhibit A). The parties now wish to have the Court issue an order with respect to the

3

Stipulation. With that in mind, the parties request that Court issue its order requiring the parties to

4

comply with the terms of the Stipulation.

5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 29, 2016

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
[Proposed] Order re Stipulation for the Identification and Preservation of the Confidentiality of Documents
Page 2