Alvarez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al
Filing
23
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/6/16 ORDERING Wells Fargo shall have a two week extension of time from Wednesday, April 6, 2016 up to and including Wednesday, April 20, 2016 to respond to the Complaint filed by Plaintiff in this Action. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — SACRAMENTO DIVISION
9
JOHN ALVAREZ,
10
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:15-cv-00943-TLN-DAD
Hon. Troy L. Nunley
Ctrm. 2
11
vs.
12
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a National
13 Banking Association, QUALITY LOAN
SERVICE CORPORATION, a California
14 corporation, VRM (VENDOR RESOURCE
MANAGEMENT), DULY AUTHORIZED
15 AGENT FOR THE SECRETARY OF
VETERANS AFFAIRS, a Texas corporation,
16 SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
17
ORDER ON STIPULATION GRANTING
TWO WEEK EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF JOHN
ALVAREZ’ COMPLAINT
Defendants.
18
19
20
Based upon the Application of defendant, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (“Wells Fargo” or
“Defendant”) and the Stipulation of Plaintiff, John Alvarez, (“Alvarez” or “Plaintiff”) and Wells
21
Fargo filed April 5, 2016, and good cause appearing, Wells Fargo shall have a two week extension
22
of time from Wednesday, April 6, 2016 up to and including Wednesday, April 20, 2016 to respond
23
to the Complaint filed by Plaintiff in this Action.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
Dated: April 6, 2016
26
27
28
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF JOHN
ALVAREZ’ COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?