Alvarez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al

Filing 23

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/6/16 ORDERING Wells Fargo shall have a two week extension of time from Wednesday, April 6, 2016 up to and including Wednesday, April 20, 2016 to respond to the Complaint filed by Plaintiff in this Action. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — SACRAMENTO DIVISION 9 JOHN ALVAREZ, 10 Plaintiff, Case No. 2:15-cv-00943-TLN-DAD Hon. Troy L. Nunley Ctrm. 2 11 vs. 12 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a National 13 Banking Association, QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION, a California 14 corporation, VRM (VENDOR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT), DULY AUTHORIZED 15 AGENT FOR THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, a Texas corporation, 16 SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, 17 ORDER ON STIPULATION GRANTING TWO WEEK EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF JOHN ALVAREZ’ COMPLAINT Defendants. 18 19 20 Based upon the Application of defendant, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (“Wells Fargo” or “Defendant”) and the Stipulation of Plaintiff, John Alvarez, (“Alvarez” or “Plaintiff”) and Wells 21 Fargo filed April 5, 2016, and good cause appearing, Wells Fargo shall have a two week extension 22 of time from Wednesday, April 6, 2016 up to and including Wednesday, April 20, 2016 to respond 23 to the Complaint filed by Plaintiff in this Action. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: April 6, 2016 26 27 28 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF JOHN ALVAREZ’ COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?