Tyczynski v. GMRI, Inc. et al
Filing
15
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 07/23/15 ORDERING that per 14 Stipulation the deadline for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is EXTENDED to 11/13/15. In the event that mediation is canceled by either party, Defendants' responsive pleading shall be filed within 21 calendar days of either party providing written notice of cancellation of the mediation. (Benson, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
KAROL TYCZYNSKI, individually,
and on behalf of other members of the
general public similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
15
GMRI, INC., d/b/a Red Lobster, a
Florida corporation; DARDEN
RESTAURANTS, INC., a Florida
corporation; and DOES 1 through 10,
inclusive,
16
17
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
633 West 5th Street
63rd Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
213.443.4300
ORDER
Case No. 2:15-cv-00949-TLN-AC
ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT UNTIL AFTER THE
SCHEDULED MEDIATION
1
ORDER
2
The Court has read and considered the Parties’ Joint Stipulation to Extend Time
3
For Defendants To Respond To Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint until after the
4
scheduled mediation.
5
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the deadline for Defendants to respond to
6
Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint is extended to November 13, 2015. In the event
7
that mediation is canceled by either party, Defendants’ responsive pleading shall be
8
filed within 21 calendar days of either party providing written notice of cancellation of
9
the mediation.
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
14
Dated: July 23, 2015
15
16
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
633 West 5th Street
63rd Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
213.443.4300
ORDER
2.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?