Bruce v. Chaiken et al
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/31/15 ORDERING that within 30 days of the date of this order, the CDCR Director shall file a response to plaintiffs July 27, 2015 motion requesting that his filing fees be collected sequenti ally; plaintiff may file a reply within fourteen days thereafter; Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order and plaintiffs July 27, 2015 motion (ECF No. 14 ) on Supervising Deputy Attorney General Monica Anderson and on the CDCR Director. (cc CDC, Monica Anderson)(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
VINCENT C. BRUCE,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:15-cv-0960 KJN P
v.
ORDER
SHAMA CHAIKEN, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant
17
18
to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s July 27, 2015 motion requesting that
19
the court order the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) to collect
20
his filing fees sequentially. (ECF No. 14.) Good cause appearing, the undersigned directs the
21
CDCR Director to respond to this motion.
22
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
23
1. Within thirty days of the date of this order, the CDCR Director shall file a response to
24
plaintiff’s July 27, 2015 motion requesting that his filing fees be collected sequentially; plaintiff
25
may file a reply within fourteen days thereafter;
26
////
27
////
28
////
1
1
2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order and plaintiff’s July 27,
2
2015 motion (ECF No. 14) on Supervising Deputy Attorney General Monica Anderson and on
3
the CDCR Director, 1515 S Street, P.O. Box 942883, Sacramento, California, 95811.
4
Dated: August 31, 2015
5
6
7
8
Br960.ord
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?